ESG controversies and the cost of equity capital of European listed companies: the moderating effects of ESG performance and market securities regulation

Fabio La Rosa, Francesca Bernini
{"title":"ESG controversies and the cost of equity capital of European listed companies: the moderating effects of ESG performance and market securities regulation","authors":"Fabio La Rosa, Francesca Bernini","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies on the cost of equity (COE) capital, exploring the moderating role of both positive ESG performance and market securities regulation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper adopts a sample of 2,599 time observations related to European listed companies for which the authors examine a set of 30 negative ESG scores across the three pillars in terms of controversies, compliance and other negative issues. This study uses the average of seven implied COE estimates.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that negative ESG performance, particularly environmental controversies, increases the COE, although this impact is mitigated when associated with company efforts to improve environmental performance. Besides, environmental controversies are likely to increase the COE in countries where the market regulation is stronger, as a consequence of higher investors’ expectations towards the scrutiny role of more efficient markets against companies’ controversies.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCompanies should take care seriously of environmental issues such as biodiversity, product impact and resource impact, because investors do react accordingly. As despite no direct effects of positive ESG performance are observed in terms of COE reduction, the mitigating role on the ESG controversies–COE relationship makes ESG practices still significant for European investors.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe effects of ESG performance on company financial performance should be investigated under the assumption that bad events weight more than positive ESG performance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBecause no prior studies have specifically assessed the effect of the European listed companies’ ESG controversies on their COE, this paper delivers insights into the relationship between positive and negative ESG performance and their effects on capital market financing.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies on the cost of equity (COE) capital, exploring the moderating role of both positive ESG performance and market securities regulation. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a sample of 2,599 time observations related to European listed companies for which the authors examine a set of 30 negative ESG scores across the three pillars in terms of controversies, compliance and other negative issues. This study uses the average of seven implied COE estimates. Findings The results show that negative ESG performance, particularly environmental controversies, increases the COE, although this impact is mitigated when associated with company efforts to improve environmental performance. Besides, environmental controversies are likely to increase the COE in countries where the market regulation is stronger, as a consequence of higher investors’ expectations towards the scrutiny role of more efficient markets against companies’ controversies. Practical implications Companies should take care seriously of environmental issues such as biodiversity, product impact and resource impact, because investors do react accordingly. As despite no direct effects of positive ESG performance are observed in terms of COE reduction, the mitigating role on the ESG controversies–COE relationship makes ESG practices still significant for European investors. Social implications The effects of ESG performance on company financial performance should be investigated under the assumption that bad events weight more than positive ESG performance. Originality/value Because no prior studies have specifically assessed the effect of the European listed companies’ ESG controversies on their COE, this paper delivers insights into the relationship between positive and negative ESG performance and their effects on capital market financing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG争议与欧洲上市公司股权资本成本:ESG绩效与市场证券监管的调节作用
本文旨在探讨环境、社会和治理(ESG)争议对股权资本成本(COE)的影响,探索积极的ESG绩效和市场证券监管的调节作用。设计/方法/方法本文采用了2599个与欧洲上市公司相关的时间观察样本,作者在争议、合规和其他负面问题方面检查了三个支柱的30个负ESG分数。本研究使用7个隐含COE估计的平均值。研究结果表明,负面的ESG绩效,特别是环境争议,会增加COE,尽管当公司努力改善环境绩效时,这种影响会得到缓解。此外,在市场监管更强的国家,环境争议可能会增加COE,因为投资者对更有效的市场对公司争议的审查作用的期望更高。公司应该认真对待环境问题,如生物多样性、产品影响和资源影响,因为投资者确实会做出相应的反应。尽管没有观察到积极的ESG绩效在COE降低方面的直接影响,但ESG争议- COE关系的缓解作用使得ESG实践对欧洲投资者来说仍然很重要。社会影响ESG绩效对公司财务绩效的影响应在假设不良事件权重大于积极ESG绩效的情况下进行调查。独创性/价值由于之前没有研究专门评估欧洲上市公司ESG争议对其COE的影响,本文提供了正面和负面ESG绩效之间的关系及其对资本市场融资的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Financial innovation and gender dynamics: a comparative study of male and female FinTech adoption in emerging economies Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC) Manager sentiment, policy uncertainty, ESG disclosure and firm performance: a large language model in corporate landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1