Scoping Review of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Reducing Medical Errors

Gisoo Alizadeh, A. Jafarzadeh, Mohammad Farough Khosravi
{"title":"Scoping Review of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Reducing Medical Errors","authors":"Gisoo Alizadeh, A. Jafarzadeh, Mohammad Farough Khosravi","doi":"10.18502/jebhpme.v5i2.6559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical errors have dramatic clinical and economic consequences. Using various information technology can reduce medical errors and improve services’ quality via preventing medical errors. In this study, the role of a computerized medical order entry system was investigated in reducing medical errors. \nMethods: This study was conducted as a scoping review. The research question was formulated; then, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, keywords (such as medical errors, adverse event, physician order entry system and control) and search strategy were determined. International databases(Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) and manual searches were used. The studies that had the inclusion criteria were entered into the study and were evaluated qualitatively, then information of studies was extracted and summarized. \nResults: In total, 16 studies were included. Most studies were about medication errors and adverse medication events. So, it is possible to claim more confidently about reducing medication errors to adverse medication events, since in studies, the impact of this system on medication errors had been further discussed. Some studies have pointed to an increase in error reports due to better checking and error entry with this system, and in general, the positive impact of this action has been mentioned in minimizing errors, especially medication errors and adverse medication events. Positive and significant effects have also been reported on prescribing errors, especially medication prescriptions. \nConclusion: Computerization of medical orders through its positive effects, can be considered a useful and appropriate intervention in increasing patient safety if implemented completely and correctly.","PeriodicalId":198049,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v5i2.6559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical errors have dramatic clinical and economic consequences. Using various information technology can reduce medical errors and improve services’ quality via preventing medical errors. In this study, the role of a computerized medical order entry system was investigated in reducing medical errors. Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review. The research question was formulated; then, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, keywords (such as medical errors, adverse event, physician order entry system and control) and search strategy were determined. International databases(Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) and manual searches were used. The studies that had the inclusion criteria were entered into the study and were evaluated qualitatively, then information of studies was extracted and summarized. Results: In total, 16 studies were included. Most studies were about medication errors and adverse medication events. So, it is possible to claim more confidently about reducing medication errors to adverse medication events, since in studies, the impact of this system on medication errors had been further discussed. Some studies have pointed to an increase in error reports due to better checking and error entry with this system, and in general, the positive impact of this action has been mentioned in minimizing errors, especially medication errors and adverse medication events. Positive and significant effects have also been reported on prescribing errors, especially medication prescriptions. Conclusion: Computerization of medical orders through its positive effects, can be considered a useful and appropriate intervention in increasing patient safety if implemented completely and correctly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机化医嘱输入系统在减少医疗差错方面的范围审查
背景:医疗差错具有显著的临床和经济后果。利用各种信息技术可以通过预防医疗差错来减少医疗差错,提高服务质量。在这项研究中,一个计算机化的医疗订单输入系统在减少医疗差错的作用进行了调查。方法:本研究为范围综述。拟定了研究问题;然后确定纳入和排除标准、关键词(如医疗差错、不良事件、医嘱录入系统和控制)和搜索策略。使用国际数据库(Scopus、ProQuest和PubMed)和人工检索。将符合纳入标准的研究纳入研究,进行定性评价,提取总结研究信息。结果:共纳入16项研究。大多数研究是关于用药错误和不良用药事件。因此,有可能更自信地声称将药物错误减少为药物不良事件,因为在研究中,该系统对药物错误的影响已经得到了进一步的讨论。一些研究指出,由于该系统更好的检查和错误输入,错误报告有所增加,总的来说,这一行动在尽量减少错误,特别是用药错误和不良用药事件方面的积极影响已经被提到。在处方错误,特别是药物处方方面也有积极和显著的影响。结论:医嘱电脑化通过其积极的作用,如果全面正确地实施,可以被认为是一种有效的、适当的提高患者安全的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring and Comparing Service Delivery Time in Government and Outsourced Health Posts Affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Virtual Reality Interventions on Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review Institutional Ownership and Concentration of Capital in Pharmaceutical Companies: Evidence from Iran Factors Affecting the Resilience of Nurses in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Mixed Method Study from West of Iran Disaster Mitigation and preparedness from the Perspective of Holy Quran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1