The Mathematics Teaching Performance of Scholar Education Graduates in Selected Public Schools in the Philippines: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Study

Liza Jean M. Nabayra, Roberto G. Sagge
{"title":"The Mathematics Teaching Performance of Scholar Education Graduates in Selected Public Schools in the Philippines: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Study","authors":"Liza Jean M. Nabayra, Roberto G. Sagge","doi":"10.53103/cjess.v2i4.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This explanatory sequential mixed method study aimed to determine the mathematics teaching performance of Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) major in Mathematics scholar education graduates for the period 2010-2015 of a certain state university in Western Visayas region in the Philippines. Eight BSEd major in Mathematics scholar education graduates and their eight department heads were included in the study purposively. The researcher adopted the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) tool of the Department of Education (DepEd) and utilized interview guide and observation guide as data gathering instruments. Moreover, the statistical tools used were mean and standard deviation to analyze and interpret quantitative data. On the other hand, thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. The study revealed that the overall performance of the scholar education graduates was very satisfactory. Moreover, the scholar graduates manifested the following in their teaching performance: a) content knowledge and relevance through mastery of the content; b) instructional strategies by using game-based strategy; c) learning activities and instructional materials by using ICT-based instructional materials; d) lesson organization and presentation by using 4A’s Model and DepEd’s format in lesson planning; e) classroom management by imposing rules and practicing routines; and f) evaluation by using authentic assessment. This shows that the scholar graduates have discovered new teaching strategies, different ways of teaching mathematics, used innovative materials and assessed students in various means not just to make themselves productive and excellent in mathematics education but to achieve quality learning for the students. It’s only then that teaching becomes rewarding. (d) Lesson Organization and Presentation, (e) Classroom Management, and (f) Evaluation?","PeriodicalId":270686,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i4.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This explanatory sequential mixed method study aimed to determine the mathematics teaching performance of Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) major in Mathematics scholar education graduates for the period 2010-2015 of a certain state university in Western Visayas region in the Philippines. Eight BSEd major in Mathematics scholar education graduates and their eight department heads were included in the study purposively. The researcher adopted the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) tool of the Department of Education (DepEd) and utilized interview guide and observation guide as data gathering instruments. Moreover, the statistical tools used were mean and standard deviation to analyze and interpret quantitative data. On the other hand, thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. The study revealed that the overall performance of the scholar education graduates was very satisfactory. Moreover, the scholar graduates manifested the following in their teaching performance: a) content knowledge and relevance through mastery of the content; b) instructional strategies by using game-based strategy; c) learning activities and instructional materials by using ICT-based instructional materials; d) lesson organization and presentation by using 4A’s Model and DepEd’s format in lesson planning; e) classroom management by imposing rules and practicing routines; and f) evaluation by using authentic assessment. This shows that the scholar graduates have discovered new teaching strategies, different ways of teaching mathematics, used innovative materials and assessed students in various means not just to make themselves productive and excellent in mathematics education but to achieve quality learning for the students. It’s only then that teaching becomes rewarding. (d) Lesson Organization and Presentation, (e) Classroom Management, and (f) Evaluation?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾选定公立学校学者教育毕业生的数学教学表现:解释性顺序混合方法研究
本解释性顺序混合方法研究旨在确定菲律宾西维萨亚斯地区某州立大学数学学者教育专业中等教育学士学位(BSEd)毕业生2010-2015年数学教学绩效。有针对性地选取了8名数学学者教育专业本科毕业生及其8名院系负责人作为研究对象。研究者采用了美国教育部(DepEd)的基于结果的绩效管理系统(Results-Based Performance Management System, RPMS)工具,并使用访谈指南和观察指南作为数据收集工具。此外,使用的统计工具是均值和标准差来分析和解释定量数据。另一方面,采用专题分析法对定性数据进行分析。研究显示,学者教育毕业生的整体表现令人满意。此外,学者毕业生在教学表现上表现为:1)通过对内容的掌握掌握内容知识和相关性;B)基于游戏的教学策略;c)使用基于信息通信技术的教学材料进行学习活动和教学材料;d)在课程规划中使用4A的模型和DepEd的格式组织和展示课程;E)通过强加规则和惯例来管理课堂;f)采用真实评价法进行评价。这表明学者毕业生发现了新的教学策略,不同的数学教学方式,使用创新的材料,通过各种方式评估学生,不仅使自己在数学教育中富有成效和优秀,而且为学生实现了优质的学习。只有这样,教学才会变得有意义。(d)课程组织与呈现,(e)课堂管理,以及(f)评估?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teacher Interaction in Technology- Supported Learning Environment (TSLE): A Social Constructivist Perspective General Practitioner Autism Training and Mandatory Medical Training: A Cross-Sectional Study of GPs’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Investigating English Learning Classes in Kindergartens in Raparin Area Language Theses and Dissertation Landscapes: An Analysis of Research Analyses Development of Cheating Dilemma as a Thought Experiment in Assessing the Student’s Ethical Decision Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1