Can the Federal Reserve Effectively Target Main Street? Evidence from the 1970s Recession

John Kandrac
{"title":"Can the Federal Reserve Effectively Target Main Street? Evidence from the 1970s Recession","authors":"John Kandrac","doi":"10.17016/FEDS.2021.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern central bankers confront a challenge of providing economic stimulus even when the policy rate is constrained by a lower bound. This challenge has led to substantial innovation by policymakers and a proliferation of new policy tools. In this paper, I offer evidence on the efficacy of a new tool known as funding for lending, which provides banks with subsidized funding to make additional loans. I focus on a historical episode from the United States in which the Federal Reserve provided banks with steeply subsidized loans to promote the expansion of credit within their local communities. I show that the cheap funding succeeded in generating more lending by countering banks' excessive liquidity preference. The additional credit benefited the real economy. Local areas enjoyed higher rates of small business formation and more rapid employment growth. Finally, I show that the cost of the subsidy provided by the government was more than offset by the additional payroll taxes paid out of higher wages and salaries. These results suggest that funding for lending programs deserve consideration for the modern central banker's toolkit and demonstrate that certain unconventional tools can offer monetary policymakers the means to pursue more targeted objectives.","PeriodicalId":284021,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2021.061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Modern central bankers confront a challenge of providing economic stimulus even when the policy rate is constrained by a lower bound. This challenge has led to substantial innovation by policymakers and a proliferation of new policy tools. In this paper, I offer evidence on the efficacy of a new tool known as funding for lending, which provides banks with subsidized funding to make additional loans. I focus on a historical episode from the United States in which the Federal Reserve provided banks with steeply subsidized loans to promote the expansion of credit within their local communities. I show that the cheap funding succeeded in generating more lending by countering banks' excessive liquidity preference. The additional credit benefited the real economy. Local areas enjoyed higher rates of small business formation and more rapid employment growth. Finally, I show that the cost of the subsidy provided by the government was more than offset by the additional payroll taxes paid out of higher wages and salaries. These results suggest that funding for lending programs deserve consideration for the modern central banker's toolkit and demonstrate that certain unconventional tools can offer monetary policymakers the means to pursue more targeted objectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美联储能有效地瞄准普通民众吗?上世纪70年代经济衰退的证据
现代央行面临着一个挑战,即在政策利率受到下限限制的情况下,如何提供经济刺激。这一挑战促使政策制定者进行了重大创新,并催生了大量新的政策工具。在本文中,我提供了一种被称为贷款融资的新工具的有效性的证据,该工具为银行提供补贴资金以发放额外贷款。我关注的是美国的一个历史事件,当时美联储向银行提供了高额补贴贷款,以促进当地社区内的信贷扩张。我指出,廉价融资通过抑制银行过度的流动性偏好,成功地产生了更多贷款。新增信贷有利于实体经济。地方小企业形成率较高,就业增长较快。最后,我证明了政府提供的补贴成本被更高的工资和薪金所支付的额外工资税所抵消。这些结果表明,为贷款项目提供资金值得现代央行行长考虑,并表明某些非常规工具可以为货币政策制定者提供追求更有针对性目标的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Socioemotional Wealth on Corporate Reporting Readability in a Multinational Family-Controlled Firm Stock Ownership of Federal Judges and its Impact on Corporations Place-Based Policies and the Geography of Corporate Investment Foreign bias in equity portfolios: Informational advantage or familiarity bias? Quantifying the Impact of Impact Investing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1