Den skjulte styringen

K. Skogen, Audun Ruud, Olve Krange
{"title":"Den skjulte styringen","authors":"K. Skogen, Audun Ruud, Olve Krange","doi":"10.23865/noasp.63.ch4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lately, we have seen several overt attempts from politicians and corporate interests to steer research in the directions they prefer. However, such attempts are always met with outrage and resistance, and they lead to extensive public debate. We contend that more subtle and hidden control over research is exercised on a day-today basis, yet it is rarely discussed. Research programs and new research centers are often designed based on premises that are no less political than clumsy attempts at controlling scientists. Programs are designed to stimulate economic growth, energy production, commodification, job creation, a more effective government, etc. These premises are rarely articulated and almost never discussed. Many Norwegian and EU research programs will automatically exclude research that questions them. This means that only research that is “useful” for particular interests is funded. The claim that this form of “usefulness” is universally good is in fact strongly political. This hidden political control impairs our possibilities to conduct research to facilitate alternative societal development trajectories and serve civic society. It should be discussed much more openly and critically than is the case today.","PeriodicalId":126889,"journal":{"name":"Interessekonflikter i forskning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interessekonflikter i forskning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.63.ch4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lately, we have seen several overt attempts from politicians and corporate interests to steer research in the directions they prefer. However, such attempts are always met with outrage and resistance, and they lead to extensive public debate. We contend that more subtle and hidden control over research is exercised on a day-today basis, yet it is rarely discussed. Research programs and new research centers are often designed based on premises that are no less political than clumsy attempts at controlling scientists. Programs are designed to stimulate economic growth, energy production, commodification, job creation, a more effective government, etc. These premises are rarely articulated and almost never discussed. Many Norwegian and EU research programs will automatically exclude research that questions them. This means that only research that is “useful” for particular interests is funded. The claim that this form of “usefulness” is universally good is in fact strongly political. This hidden political control impairs our possibilities to conduct research to facilitate alternative societal development trajectories and serve civic society. It should be discussed much more openly and critically than is the case today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最近,我们看到一些政客和企业公然试图将研究引向他们喜欢的方向。然而,这种尝试总是遭到愤怒和抵制,并引发广泛的公众辩论。我们认为,对研究的更微妙和隐藏的控制每天都在进行,但很少被讨论。研究项目和新研究中心的设计往往基于这样的前提,这种前提不亚于控制科学家的笨拙尝试。这些计划旨在刺激经济增长、能源生产、商品化、创造就业机会、建立更有效的政府等。这些前提很少被阐明,也几乎从未被讨论过。许多挪威和欧盟的研究项目将自动排除质疑它们的研究。这意味着只有对特定利益“有用”的研究才会得到资助。这种形式的“有用性”是普遍有益的说法实际上带有强烈的政治性。这种隐藏的政治控制削弱了我们进行研究以促进其他社会发展轨迹和为公民社会服务的可能性。应该比现在更公开、更批判地讨论这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kunnskapsbasert forvaltning og dilemmaer knyttet til usikkerhet Introduksjon Økt legitimitet til konsekvensutredninger i Norge – Kan økt bevissthet om organisering og endrede roller styrke tilliten til ordningen? Forskerens frihet når interesser vil styre Forskning for politikk: Om uavhengighet i direktoratsektoren
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1