Acute Renal Failure

S. Ross, C. Osborne, J. Lulich, D. Polzin
{"title":"Acute Renal Failure","authors":"S. Ross, C. Osborne, J. Lulich, D. Polzin","doi":"10.1201/9780138719128-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have found colonoscopic polypectomy to be a safe and efficient procedure. It is well tolerated, even by elderly, high-risk patients. The procedure at times is diicult and time-consuming. We would advise, therefore, that only those who have had gastrointestinal endoscopy experience should undertake it. Our findings are similar to those reported by other investigators as to size, location, pathologic features, complications and incidence of malignancy in colonic polyps.\" It is too early to ascertain whether complete removal of malignant adenomatous polyps by colonoscopic cautery snare will prove to be a curative procedure. At present we would advise that patients with malignant changes be treated by laparotomy and segmental resection. Longterm follow-up of a significant number of cases is needed to show whether we are removing these lesions completely enough and, therefore, whether localized carcinoma in pedunculated adenomatous polyps can be cured without operation. Colonoscopic polypectomy, as a non-invasive procedure, has major advantages over laparotomy, colotomy and polypectomy. The average length of time spent in hospital in our series was 36 hours and the average time lost from work was 48 hours. The patient usually is able to return to regular activity in 72 hours. A normal diet is resumed on the first day after polypectomy and the cost to the patient or the insurance carrier is reduced by approximately 75 percent.","PeriodicalId":335807,"journal":{"name":"The Veterinary ICU Book","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Veterinary ICU Book","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780138719128-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have found colonoscopic polypectomy to be a safe and efficient procedure. It is well tolerated, even by elderly, high-risk patients. The procedure at times is diicult and time-consuming. We would advise, therefore, that only those who have had gastrointestinal endoscopy experience should undertake it. Our findings are similar to those reported by other investigators as to size, location, pathologic features, complications and incidence of malignancy in colonic polyps." It is too early to ascertain whether complete removal of malignant adenomatous polyps by colonoscopic cautery snare will prove to be a curative procedure. At present we would advise that patients with malignant changes be treated by laparotomy and segmental resection. Longterm follow-up of a significant number of cases is needed to show whether we are removing these lesions completely enough and, therefore, whether localized carcinoma in pedunculated adenomatous polyps can be cured without operation. Colonoscopic polypectomy, as a non-invasive procedure, has major advantages over laparotomy, colotomy and polypectomy. The average length of time spent in hospital in our series was 36 hours and the average time lost from work was 48 hours. The patient usually is able to return to regular activity in 72 hours. A normal diet is resumed on the first day after polypectomy and the cost to the patient or the insurance carrier is reduced by approximately 75 percent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性肾衰竭
我们发现结肠镜息肉切除术是一种安全有效的手术。它的耐受性很好,甚至对老年高危患者也是如此。这个过程有时既困难又耗时。因此,我们建议,只有那些有胃肠内窥镜检查经验的人才应该进行。我们的研究结果与其他研究者在结肠息肉的大小、位置、病理特征、并发症和恶性肿瘤发生率方面的研究结果相似。”结肠镜下烧灼圈套术完全切除恶性腺瘤性息肉是否能治愈,目前还言之过早。目前我们建议对恶性肿瘤患者行剖腹手术和节段性切除。需要对大量病例进行长期随访,以证明我们是否完全切除了这些病变,因此,有蒂腺瘤性息肉的局部癌是否可以不手术治愈。结肠镜息肉切除术作为一种非侵入性手术,与剖腹手术、结肠切除术和息肉切除术相比有很大的优势。在我们的研究中,平均住院时间为36小时,平均旷工时间为48小时。患者通常能在72小时内恢复正常活动。息肉切除后的第一天恢复正常饮食,患者或保险公司的费用减少了大约75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluid and Electrolyte Therapy Acute Tumor Lysis Syndrome Parathyroid Disorders Pulmonary Edema Receptor Physiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1