Negotiating between the Constant and the Changing: Balancing Acts in the Training of Writing Teachers

Heping Zhao
{"title":"Negotiating between the Constant and the Changing: Balancing Acts in the Training of Writing Teachers","authors":"Heping Zhao","doi":"10.26417/EJLS.V2I1.P19-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract TA training is an important component of any rhetoric/composition program in American universities. As a faculty member in the Department of English, Comparative Literature, and Linguistics with a specialty in classical oratory and comparative rhetoric, I have been training TAs for over a decade as a significant portion of my teaching assignment. In my presentation, I would like to discuss the major factors that affect the quality of the TA training program and ways to balance these factors to maximize the learning experience for the TAs. TAs, short for “teaching assistants” or “teaching associates,” are graduate students in English who are assigned to teach a writing class or two, usually of beginning college level. It is essential that these graduate students be provided with detailed hands-on training both in theory and in practice every step of the way in order for them to feel confident and comfortable in the classroom. My role as their teacher and supervising instructor is to provide them with fundamental training, laying a solid foundation for them to grow professionally. As I see it, four major factors interact in the TA training process: the available theory, the institutional and academic expectations, the class of student writers they each teach, and the TAs themselves as a team. Some of these factors are relatively constant; others are fluid and always changing. They often present fresh challenges when they interact in the writing classroom. I would like to explore how these factors act upon each other and complement each other as I try to create an environment in which the TAs feel encouraged to learn and experiment on their own with a minimal amount of guidance. I will argue that, based on my years of experience and on the reflections by the TAs themselves, it is of critical importance that the focus be placed on the balancing of the four factors in an individualized approach for TA training.","PeriodicalId":243759,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Language and Literature Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Language and Literature Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/EJLS.V2I1.P19-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract TA training is an important component of any rhetoric/composition program in American universities. As a faculty member in the Department of English, Comparative Literature, and Linguistics with a specialty in classical oratory and comparative rhetoric, I have been training TAs for over a decade as a significant portion of my teaching assignment. In my presentation, I would like to discuss the major factors that affect the quality of the TA training program and ways to balance these factors to maximize the learning experience for the TAs. TAs, short for “teaching assistants” or “teaching associates,” are graduate students in English who are assigned to teach a writing class or two, usually of beginning college level. It is essential that these graduate students be provided with detailed hands-on training both in theory and in practice every step of the way in order for them to feel confident and comfortable in the classroom. My role as their teacher and supervising instructor is to provide them with fundamental training, laying a solid foundation for them to grow professionally. As I see it, four major factors interact in the TA training process: the available theory, the institutional and academic expectations, the class of student writers they each teach, and the TAs themselves as a team. Some of these factors are relatively constant; others are fluid and always changing. They often present fresh challenges when they interact in the writing classroom. I would like to explore how these factors act upon each other and complement each other as I try to create an environment in which the TAs feel encouraged to learn and experiment on their own with a minimal amount of guidance. I will argue that, based on my years of experience and on the reflections by the TAs themselves, it is of critical importance that the focus be placed on the balancing of the four factors in an individualized approach for TA training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不变与变化的协调:写作教师培训中的平衡行为
摘要助教训练是美国大学修辞学/写作课程的重要组成部分。作为英语、比较文学和语言学系的一名教师,我的专业是古典演讲和比较修辞,十多年来,我一直在培训助教,这是我教学任务的重要组成部分。在我的演讲中,我想讨论影响助教培训项目质量的主要因素,以及平衡这些因素的方法,以最大限度地提高助教的学习体验。助教是“教学助理”或“教学助理”的缩写,是指被指派教授一到两节写作课的研究生,通常是大学初级水平的学生。为了让这些研究生在课堂上感到自信和舒适,为他们提供理论和实践方面的详细实践培训是至关重要的。作为他们的老师和指导老师,我的职责是为他们提供基础培训,为他们的专业成长奠定坚实的基础。在我看来,助教培训过程中有四个主要因素相互作用:可用的理论、机构和学术期望、他们各自教授的学生写作班级,以及助教本身作为一个团队。其中一些因素是相对恒定的;其他人是流动的,总是在变化。当他们在写作课堂上互动时,他们经常会提出新的挑战。我想探索这些因素是如何相互作用和相互补充的,因为我试图创造一个环境,在这个环境中,助教们感到被鼓励在最少的指导下自己学习和实验。根据我多年的经验和助教们自己的反思,我认为,在个性化的助教培训方法中,把重点放在平衡这四个因素上是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Founding Elements of Enlightenment Philosophy: The Relationship Between Language, Knowledge and Society Fairy Tales and the Lingual and Intellectual Development in Preschoolers The Handling of Adjectives as Part of the Narrative in the Work “King of Gians” by Kole Jakove The Opinions of Teachers and School Leaders on the Improvement of the Evaluation Process and the Influencing Factors in the Teacher Evaluation Process! Intergenerational Discourse: Its Essence and Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1