Combination Analysis of Multi-Wavelength, Multi-Parameter Radar Measurements for Snowfall

M. Oue, P. Kollias, S. Matrosov, A. Battaglia, A. Ryzhkov
{"title":"Combination Analysis of Multi-Wavelength, Multi-Parameter Radar Measurements for Snowfall","authors":"M. Oue, P. Kollias, S. Matrosov, A. Battaglia, A. Ryzhkov","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2021-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Radar dual wavelength ratio (DWR) measurements from the Stony Brook Radar Observatory Ka-band Scanning Polarimetric Radar (KASPR, 35 GHz), a profiling W-band (94 GHz) and a next generation K-band (24-GHz) Micro Rain Radar (MRRPro) were exploited for ice particle identification using triple frequency approaches. The results indicated that two of the radar frequencies (K- and Ka-band) are not sufficiently separated, thus, the triple radar frequency approaches had limited success. On the other hand, a joint analysis of DWR, mean vertical Doppler velocity (MDV), and polarimetric radar variables indicated potential in identifying ice particle types and distinguishing among different ice growth processes and even in revealing additional microphysical details.We investigated all DWR pairs in conjunction with MDV from the KASPR profiling measurements and differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase (KDP) from the KASPR quasi-vertical profiles. The DWR-versus-MDV diagrams coupled with the polarimetric observables exhibited distinct separations of particle populations attributed to different rime degrees and particle growth processes. In fallstreaks, the 35–94 GHz DWR pair increased with the magnitude of MDV corresponding to the scattering calculations for aggregates with lower degrees of riming. The DWR values further increased at lower altitudes while ZDR slightly decreased, indicating further aggregation. Particle populations with higher rime degrees had a similar increase of DWR, but the 1–1.5 m s−1 larger magnitude of MDV and rapid decreases in KDP and ZDR. The analysis also depicted the early stage of riming where ZDR increased with the MDV magnitude collocated with small increases of DWR. This approach will improve quantitative estimations of snow amount and microphysical quantities such as rime mass fraction.\n","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"4 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2021-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. Radar dual wavelength ratio (DWR) measurements from the Stony Brook Radar Observatory Ka-band Scanning Polarimetric Radar (KASPR, 35 GHz), a profiling W-band (94 GHz) and a next generation K-band (24-GHz) Micro Rain Radar (MRRPro) were exploited for ice particle identification using triple frequency approaches. The results indicated that two of the radar frequencies (K- and Ka-band) are not sufficiently separated, thus, the triple radar frequency approaches had limited success. On the other hand, a joint analysis of DWR, mean vertical Doppler velocity (MDV), and polarimetric radar variables indicated potential in identifying ice particle types and distinguishing among different ice growth processes and even in revealing additional microphysical details.We investigated all DWR pairs in conjunction with MDV from the KASPR profiling measurements and differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase (KDP) from the KASPR quasi-vertical profiles. The DWR-versus-MDV diagrams coupled with the polarimetric observables exhibited distinct separations of particle populations attributed to different rime degrees and particle growth processes. In fallstreaks, the 35–94 GHz DWR pair increased with the magnitude of MDV corresponding to the scattering calculations for aggregates with lower degrees of riming. The DWR values further increased at lower altitudes while ZDR slightly decreased, indicating further aggregation. Particle populations with higher rime degrees had a similar increase of DWR, but the 1–1.5 m s−1 larger magnitude of MDV and rapid decreases in KDP and ZDR. The analysis also depicted the early stage of riming where ZDR increased with the MDV magnitude collocated with small increases of DWR. This approach will improve quantitative estimations of snow amount and microphysical quantities such as rime mass fraction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降雪多波长、多参数雷达测量组合分析
摘要利用石溪雷达观测站ka波段扫描极化雷达(KASPR, 35 GHz)、w波段剖面雷达(94 GHz)和下一代k波段微雨雷达(MRRPro)的雷达双波长比(DWR)测量数据,利用三频方法识别冰粒。结果表明,两个雷达频率(K波段和ka波段)没有充分分离,因此,三雷达频率接近的成功有限。另一方面,对DWR、平均垂直多普勒速度(MDV)和极化雷达变量的联合分析表明,在识别冰粒类型和区分不同的冰生长过程,甚至揭示额外的微物理细节方面具有潜力。我们将所有DWR对与来自KASPR剖面测量的MDV以及来自KASPR准垂直剖面的差反射率(ZDR)和比差相位(KDP)结合起来进行了研究。与极化观测相结合的dwr - vs - mdv图显示出由于不同的时间度和颗粒生长过程而导致的颗粒群的明显分离。在降条纹中,35-94 GHz DWR对随MDV的大小而增加,对应于低边缘度聚集体的散射计算。低海拔DWR值进一步增大,而ZDR值略有减小,表明进一步聚集。高龄期粒子群的DWR增幅相似,但1 ~ 1.5 m s−1的MDV幅度较大,KDP和ZDR下降较快。分析还描述了轮蚀的早期阶段,其中ZDR随着MDV的大小而增加,而DWR则小幅增加。这种方法将改进雪量和微物理量(如雾凇质量分数)的定量估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved monitoring of shipping NO2 with TROPOMI: decreasing NOx emissions in European seas during the COVID-19 pandemic Continuous mapping of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air quality in East Asia at daily 6×6 km2 resolution by application of a random forest algorithm to 2011–2019 GOCI geostationary satellite data Fill dynamics and sample mixing in the AirCore  Relative errors of derived multi-wavelengths intensive aerosol optical properties using CAPS_SSA, Nephelometer and TAP measurements Laboratory evaluation of the scattering matrix of ragweed, ash, birch and pine pollens towards pollen classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1