The Commercial Fourth Estate in the 2014–2019 Election Campaigns

Katia Mihailova
{"title":"The Commercial Fourth Estate in the 2014–2019 Election Campaigns","authors":"Katia Mihailova","doi":"10.54664/tohc7176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents results of media monitoring during the election campaigns held in Bulgaria between 2014 and 2019 – after the adoption of the new Electoral Code in 2014 until the last local elections in 2019. The main research question is to what extent the media as mediators in the election campaigns know, respect and comply with the legal regulations concerning their activities during such campaigns. The results outline the models of legal socialization of the Fourth Estate in the election campaigns. They also show patterns of compliance and violation of the legal framework. In addition, they reflect the way in which the media work to change the regulations in question. The research sample included between 117 and 180 media service providers in various election campaigns. There were representatives of all media subfields – traditional media, new media, yellow media, brown media, Prokopiev’s media, Peevski’s media, as well as Russian and American “propaganda media”. The period of research includes almost two full election cycles ‒ two parliamentary elections, two European elections, two local elections, and one presidential election which was held after the clear definition of the legal framework for media in the 2014 Electoral Code. No changes were made to this framework during the study and prior to the publication of this paper. This leads to conclusions regarding the electoral legislation and the regulation of the media system in the electoral process.","PeriodicalId":346008,"journal":{"name":"21st Century Media and Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Century Media and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/tohc7176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents results of media monitoring during the election campaigns held in Bulgaria between 2014 and 2019 – after the adoption of the new Electoral Code in 2014 until the last local elections in 2019. The main research question is to what extent the media as mediators in the election campaigns know, respect and comply with the legal regulations concerning their activities during such campaigns. The results outline the models of legal socialization of the Fourth Estate in the election campaigns. They also show patterns of compliance and violation of the legal framework. In addition, they reflect the way in which the media work to change the regulations in question. The research sample included between 117 and 180 media service providers in various election campaigns. There were representatives of all media subfields – traditional media, new media, yellow media, brown media, Prokopiev’s media, Peevski’s media, as well as Russian and American “propaganda media”. The period of research includes almost two full election cycles ‒ two parliamentary elections, two European elections, two local elections, and one presidential election which was held after the clear definition of the legal framework for media in the 2014 Electoral Code. No changes were made to this framework during the study and prior to the publication of this paper. This leads to conclusions regarding the electoral legislation and the regulation of the media system in the electoral process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014-2019年大选中的商业第四阶层
本文介绍了2014年至2019年保加利亚选举期间(从2014年通过新选举法到2019年最后一次地方选举)媒体监测的结果。主要的研究问题是,作为选举活动调解人的媒体在多大程度上了解、尊重和遵守有关其在竞选期间活动的法律规定。研究结果概述了第四阶层在竞选活动中的法律社会化模式。它们还显示了遵守和违反法律框架的模式。此外,它们反映了媒体改变相关规定的方式。研究样本包括117至180家参与各种竞选活动的媒体服务提供商。传统媒体、新媒体、黄色媒体、棕色媒体、普罗科皮耶夫媒体、佩耶夫斯基媒体,以及俄罗斯和美国的“宣传媒体”,都有媒体子领域的代表。研究期间包括几乎两个完整的选举周期-两次议会选举,两次欧洲选举,两次地方选举,以及2014年选举法明确定义媒体法律框架后举行的一次总统选举。在研究期间和本文发表之前,该框架未做任何更改。由此得出关于选举立法和选举过程中媒体制度的管理的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Media View of Traditions in Modern Bulgarian Society Interdiscursivity of New Media (Following the Content Examples of the Belarusian Media Holding “Culture and Art”) Georgi Yurukov: The Underappreciated and Forgotten Book Publisher Local Festivals through the Eyes of the Media Influencers as Creators of Valuable Brand Content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1