Benefits for Child Care Workers: How the State Could Help through a Medicaid Waiver

A. M. Scott
{"title":"Benefits for Child Care Workers: How the State Could Help through a Medicaid Waiver","authors":"A. M. Scott","doi":"10.13001/jwcs.v6i1.6437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Child care is expensive, and many parents struggle to afford care; furthermore, even though child care costs are high, child care providers in the United States (US) are not making a living wage. Child care professionals (ages 0-5 in child care homes or centers) earn less income than Kindergarten teachers, pre-K teachers, non-farm animal caretakers, and the US estimate of all workers’ annual median salary (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020a, 2020b). Workers in comparable professions are also usually offered benefits for their labor, which child care professionals are not (Kwon, 2019; National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team, 2020; Otten et al., 2019; Whitebook, McLean, Austin, & Edwards, 2018).  This often necessitates use of public assistance.  Because many child care workers are not provided access to health insurance or other health-related benefits through their employers, they must seek access to health care in other ways.  Additionally, turnover rates among child care workers are high, and wages and benefits are a large part of the reason why child care professionals leave their jobs (McDougald Scott, 2021a). This policy analysis (a) reviewed the current struggle (as of May 2021) that child care workers in the United States (in general) and South Carolina (in particular) experience compared with employees in other fields; and (b) explore options (particularly a Medicaid waiver option) that might improve the situation.  South Carolina (SC) is one of the 13 states that have not expanded Medicaid; most of the 13 states are in Southern United States (US) region, which makes an extrapolation of SC research reasonable.  Lessons learned from SC childcare data should reflect closely what may be found in other non-expansion states, but research from the literature review will not be SC-specific. Relevant peer-reviewed, government documents, state and national data, and grey literature were reviewed and analyzed. There have been ongoing efforts (although insufficient even in more successful efforts) with mixed results to improve the pay for child care workers for decades.  Progress for earning a living wage will require a systems overhaul for early education, but child care providers cannot wait for workforce environmental improvements.  Action must be taken now to augment the shortage of healthcare access for child care providers.  In SC, Medicaid helps some child care workers receive access to health care, but expansion through Medicaid waiver 1115 would include many more child care workers who do not currently have access. ","PeriodicalId":258091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Working-Class Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Working-Class Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13001/jwcs.v6i1.6437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Child care is expensive, and many parents struggle to afford care; furthermore, even though child care costs are high, child care providers in the United States (US) are not making a living wage. Child care professionals (ages 0-5 in child care homes or centers) earn less income than Kindergarten teachers, pre-K teachers, non-farm animal caretakers, and the US estimate of all workers’ annual median salary (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020a, 2020b). Workers in comparable professions are also usually offered benefits for their labor, which child care professionals are not (Kwon, 2019; National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team, 2020; Otten et al., 2019; Whitebook, McLean, Austin, & Edwards, 2018).  This often necessitates use of public assistance.  Because many child care workers are not provided access to health insurance or other health-related benefits through their employers, they must seek access to health care in other ways.  Additionally, turnover rates among child care workers are high, and wages and benefits are a large part of the reason why child care professionals leave their jobs (McDougald Scott, 2021a). This policy analysis (a) reviewed the current struggle (as of May 2021) that child care workers in the United States (in general) and South Carolina (in particular) experience compared with employees in other fields; and (b) explore options (particularly a Medicaid waiver option) that might improve the situation.  South Carolina (SC) is one of the 13 states that have not expanded Medicaid; most of the 13 states are in Southern United States (US) region, which makes an extrapolation of SC research reasonable.  Lessons learned from SC childcare data should reflect closely what may be found in other non-expansion states, but research from the literature review will not be SC-specific. Relevant peer-reviewed, government documents, state and national data, and grey literature were reviewed and analyzed. There have been ongoing efforts (although insufficient even in more successful efforts) with mixed results to improve the pay for child care workers for decades.  Progress for earning a living wage will require a systems overhaul for early education, but child care providers cannot wait for workforce environmental improvements.  Action must be taken now to augment the shortage of healthcare access for child care providers.  In SC, Medicaid helps some child care workers receive access to health care, but expansion through Medicaid waiver 1115 would include many more child care workers who do not currently have access. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童保育工作者的福利:国家如何通过医疗补助豁免提供帮助
儿童保育费用昂贵,许多父母都难以负担得起;此外,尽管儿童保育成本很高,但美国的儿童保育提供者却无法赚取维持生活的工资。儿童保育专业人员(0-5岁在托儿所或中心)的收入低于幼儿园教师、学前班教师、非农场动物饲养员和美国所有工人的年平均工资(劳工统计局,2020a, 2020b)。从事类似职业的工人通常也会获得劳动福利,而儿童保育专业人员则没有(Kwon, 2019;全国早教调查项目组,2020;Otten等人,2019;白皮书,麦克莱恩,奥斯汀和爱德华兹,2018年)。这往往需要使用公共援助。由于许多儿童保育工作者无法通过其雇主获得医疗保险或其他与健康有关的福利,他们必须通过其他方式寻求获得医疗保健。此外,儿童保育工作者的流失率很高,工资和福利是儿童保育专业人员离职的很大一部分原因(McDougald Scott, 2021a)。本政策分析(a)回顾了目前(截至2021年5月)美国(总体上)和南卡罗来纳州(特别是)的托儿工作者与其他领域的员工相比所经历的斗争;(b)探索可能改善情况的选项(特别是医疗补助豁免选项)。南卡罗来纳州(SC)是13个没有扩大医疗补助计划的州之一;13个州中大部分位于美国南部地区,这使得SC研究的外推是合理的。从SC托儿数据中吸取的经验教训应密切反映在其他非扩张状态中可能发现的情况,但文献综述中的研究将不是SC特有的。对相关的同行评议、政府文件、州和国家数据以及灰色文献进行了回顾和分析。几十年来,人们一直在努力提高儿童保育工作者的工资(尽管在更成功的努力中还不够),结果好坏参半。要想获得维持生活的工资,就需要对早期教育进行系统改革,但儿童保育机构不能等待劳动力环境的改善。现在必须采取行动,解决儿童保健提供者缺乏保健服务的问题。在南卡罗来纳州,医疗补助计划帮助一些儿童保育工作者获得医疗保健,但通过医疗补助豁免1115的扩展将包括更多目前没有获得医疗保健的儿童保育工作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zweig, Michael (2023) Class, Race, and Gender: Challenging the Injuries and Divisions of Capitalism. PM Press Cowie, Jefferson (2022) Freedom’s Dominion: A Saga of White Resistance to Federal Power. Basic Books O’Sullivan, S. (2022) Reality TV’s Real Men of the Recession: White Masculinity In Crisis and the Rise of Trumpism. Lexington Books Middletown Lives through Middle-Class Eyes: Hillbilly Elegy and the Problem with the “Liberal Media” Motorcycle on my mind
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1