Central Bank Digital Currency Is Good As Long As All Stakeholders Are Involved

M. F. Gadi, Miguel Angel Sicilia
{"title":"Central Bank Digital Currency Is Good As Long As All Stakeholders Are Involved","authors":"M. F. Gadi, Miguel Angel Sicilia","doi":"10.46671/2521-2486.1023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent changes in the money supply landscape like the rise of Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and also China pushing for broader use of its Digital Yuan soon [1] are forcing governments around the world to investigate about central bank [issued] digital currency (CBDC). In this work We want to analyse the level of understanding of CBDC, opportunities, risks, limitations and obstacles. We explore the pros cons and possibilities of implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) by highlighting the different levels of acceptance of a CBDC from four groups of stakeholders: Central Bankers, Bankers, Fintech and General Public. The result from our survey carried out during the month of February 2022 shows different concerns depending on the stakeholder, we can highlight: that Fintech, Digital Bankers and Bankers agree that digital currencies could lessen the risk of money laundering, Central Banks do not believe this. All groups agreed that credit card companies like Visa, Mastercard will lose up market share. Also, while Central Bankers believe that cutting off traditional banks from the supply of digital currency means that there is no multiplier effect in the economy, Bankers and people in Fintech and the general public do not believe so. From what we conclude that the creation of the CBDC is in good taste so long as all stakeholders are involved, and big issues such as privacy, and risk of it affecting the current financial system are kept in mind.","PeriodicalId":296412,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46671/2521-2486.1023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Recent changes in the money supply landscape like the rise of Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and also China pushing for broader use of its Digital Yuan soon [1] are forcing governments around the world to investigate about central bank [issued] digital currency (CBDC). In this work We want to analyse the level of understanding of CBDC, opportunities, risks, limitations and obstacles. We explore the pros cons and possibilities of implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) by highlighting the different levels of acceptance of a CBDC from four groups of stakeholders: Central Bankers, Bankers, Fintech and General Public. The result from our survey carried out during the month of February 2022 shows different concerns depending on the stakeholder, we can highlight: that Fintech, Digital Bankers and Bankers agree that digital currencies could lessen the risk of money laundering, Central Banks do not believe this. All groups agreed that credit card companies like Visa, Mastercard will lose up market share. Also, while Central Bankers believe that cutting off traditional banks from the supply of digital currency means that there is no multiplier effect in the economy, Bankers and people in Fintech and the general public do not believe so. From what we conclude that the creation of the CBDC is in good taste so long as all stakeholders are involved, and big issues such as privacy, and risk of it affecting the current financial system are kept in mind.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只要所有利益相关者都参与进来,数字货币就是好的
最近货币供应格局的变化,如比特币等加密货币的兴起,以及中国推动更广泛地使用其数字人民币[1],正迫使世界各国政府对央行发行的数字货币(CBDC)进行调查。在这项工作中,我们想分析对CBDC的理解程度、机会、风险、限制和障碍。我们通过强调四组利益相关者(中央银行家、银行家、金融科技和公众)对CBDC的不同接受程度,探讨了实施央行数字货币(CBDC)的利弊和可能性。我们在2022年2月进行的调查结果显示了不同利益相关者的不同担忧,我们可以强调:金融科技,数字银行家和银行家同意数字货币可以降低洗钱风险,中央银行不相信这一点。所有组织一致认为,Visa、万事达等信用卡公司将失去市场份额。此外,虽然央行官员认为,切断传统银行的数字货币供应意味着经济中没有乘数效应,但银行家和金融科技人士以及公众并不这么认为。从我们的结论来看,只要所有利益相关者都参与进来,CBDC的创建就是好的,并且要记住隐私等重大问题,以及影响当前金融体系的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concentrated liquidity in Uniswap V3: A new strategy to optimize the capital bear market Striving Toward Bitcoin Price Stability: Second-layer Money and the Case for Real Bills, Scrip & Notes Profits & Pandemics: Shutting Down Businesses During COVID-19 Virtual Currencies and Intrapreneurial Coordination Decentralized Finance Oracles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1