Responsibly Managing Risks To The Environment: Stakeholders And Their Communication Contract

Birgitta Dresp
{"title":"Responsibly Managing Risks To The Environment: Stakeholders And Their Communication Contract","authors":"Birgitta Dresp","doi":"10.2174/1874829501205010019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design of tools and procedures for the responsible and effective management of risks to humans and their environment is an important topic in modern environmental engineering. This article places the ethical ground clauses of a communication contract in the particular context of early hazard warnings. How respecting ethical ground clauses of communication may help avoid that the short-term economic interests of a few are placed before the long-term interests of society as a whole is explained on the basis of examples from disaster case studies. The need for rules which ensure that relevant information is effectively transmitted, received, and taken into account promptly is highlighted. Why successfully implementing such rules involves the individual responsibility of all stakeholders, from witnesses or victims to scientific experts and policy makers, is made clear. The ethical ground clauses of the communication contract introduced here provide universal rules for responsible communication, defined in terms of general guidelines for sincere, transparent, prompt, and cooperative information sharing, in particular in risk management. Earlier work has shown that implementing such a communication contract in corporate decision making helps promote stakeholder responsibility awareness, and triggers a learning process for initiating and fostering individual and collective behavior that will ultimately lead to responsible decisions and actions. These latter are the prerequisite for mitigating the potentially disastrous consequences of non-action in response to early warnings, when relevant scientific data and/or expert knowledge are not adequately taken into account because of faulty communication, identified as the major cause of delayed action in numerous case studies. Limitations of the communication contract theory are pointed out.","PeriodicalId":344616,"journal":{"name":"The Open Environmental Engineering Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Environmental Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874829501205010019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The design of tools and procedures for the responsible and effective management of risks to humans and their environment is an important topic in modern environmental engineering. This article places the ethical ground clauses of a communication contract in the particular context of early hazard warnings. How respecting ethical ground clauses of communication may help avoid that the short-term economic interests of a few are placed before the long-term interests of society as a whole is explained on the basis of examples from disaster case studies. The need for rules which ensure that relevant information is effectively transmitted, received, and taken into account promptly is highlighted. Why successfully implementing such rules involves the individual responsibility of all stakeholders, from witnesses or victims to scientific experts and policy makers, is made clear. The ethical ground clauses of the communication contract introduced here provide universal rules for responsible communication, defined in terms of general guidelines for sincere, transparent, prompt, and cooperative information sharing, in particular in risk management. Earlier work has shown that implementing such a communication contract in corporate decision making helps promote stakeholder responsibility awareness, and triggers a learning process for initiating and fostering individual and collective behavior that will ultimately lead to responsible decisions and actions. These latter are the prerequisite for mitigating the potentially disastrous consequences of non-action in response to early warnings, when relevant scientific data and/or expert knowledge are not adequately taken into account because of faulty communication, identified as the major cause of delayed action in numerous case studies. Limitations of the communication contract theory are pointed out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负责任地管理环境风险:利益相关者及其沟通契约
设计工具和程序,对人类及其环境的风险进行负责任和有效的管理,是现代环境工程中的一个重要课题。本文将通信合同的伦理基础条款置于早期危险预警的特殊背景下。尊重沟通的伦理基础条款如何有助于避免将少数人的短期经济利益置于整个社会的长期利益之上,本文以灾难案例研究中的例子为基础解释了这一点。强调需要制定规则,确保有效地传送、接收和迅速考虑到有关信息。为什么成功实施这些规则涉及从证人或受害者到科学专家和决策者的所有利益攸关方的个人责任,这一点是明确的。这里介绍的传播合同的伦理基础条款为负责任的传播提供了通用规则,定义为真诚、透明、及时和合作的信息共享的一般准则,特别是在风险管理方面。早期的研究表明,在公司决策中实施这种沟通契约有助于提高利益相关者的责任意识,并触发一个学习过程,以启动和培养个人和集体行为,最终导致负责任的决策和行动。后者是减轻对早期预警不采取行动可能造成的灾难性后果的先决条件,因为由于通信错误而没有充分考虑到有关的科学数据和(或)专家知识,在许多案例研究中,通信错误被确定为延迟行动的主要原因。指出了通信契约理论的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preliminary tests on a wireless sensor network for pervasive dust monitoring in construction sites Evaluation of Geographic Information Systems-Based Spatial InterpolationMethods Using Ohio Indoor Radon Data Enhanced Methane Production from Pilot-Scale Anaerobic DigesterLoaded with Rice Straw Effects of heavy metal pollution on ω3 polyunsaturated fatty acids levels in tilapia fish from Winam Gulf of Lake Victoria Potential Macrophytes for Nitrogen Removal from Domestic Wastewater in Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands in Tanzania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1