THE SATISFACTION OF BEING A REBEL

B. Gangloff, Luisa Mayoral, A. Rezrazi
{"title":"THE SATISFACTION OF BEING A REBEL","authors":"B. Gangloff, Luisa Mayoral, A. Rezrazi","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Several researches in organizational environment have shown that there is a norm of allegiance; it consists in valuing positively employees who not only obey the orders of their hierarchical superiors but who also avoid any criticism of them. Here is questioned the degree of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with adopting or refusing to adopt such behavior. 120 employees of the Argentinian private sector (60 men and 60 women) were contacted using the snowball technique and, on a voluntary basis, answered anonymously to two questionnaires. The first one was an allegiance questionnaire of 24 items from the questionnaires of Gangloff & Caboux (2003) and Gangloff & Duchon (2008): 12 items of general allegiance and 12 items differentiating the reasons for allegiance (ideological vs. opportunist). Examples: \"\"With my boss, I rarely try to defend my ideas\"\" (general allegiance item); “When my boss takes a decision, I rarely challenge it. Whatever the decision: you should not challenge your boss” (ideological allegiance); “Even if my boss's orders sometimes seem absurd to me, as I want to have quick promotions, I generally obey” (opportunistic allegiance). The subjects answered each item by indicating whether, usually, they adopted rather allegiant or rather rebellious conduct, and they specified, in each of the two cases, if this adoption satisfied or dissatisfied them. Considering that satisfaction is a constituent element of well-being, a second questionnaire was used the Scale for Measuring Manifestations of Psychological Well-Being (EMMDEP) by Massé et al. (1998), made up of 25 items in which subjects ticked off as \"\"somewhat agree\"\" (rated 1) vs. \"\"somewhat disagree\"\" (rated 0). The results show that 1) allegiant conducts are more frequent than rebellious ones, but only among women (among men, the difference is not significant); 2) dissatisfaction is more frequent with adopting allegiant conducts than with adopting rebellious ones, whatever the gender; 3) satisfaction is more frequent than dissatisfaction, both for the allegiant conducts and for the rebels; 4) Satisfied participants express more well-being than unsatisfied participants. The limits and practical consequences of these results will be discussed.\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Several researches in organizational environment have shown that there is a norm of allegiance; it consists in valuing positively employees who not only obey the orders of their hierarchical superiors but who also avoid any criticism of them. Here is questioned the degree of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with adopting or refusing to adopt such behavior. 120 employees of the Argentinian private sector (60 men and 60 women) were contacted using the snowball technique and, on a voluntary basis, answered anonymously to two questionnaires. The first one was an allegiance questionnaire of 24 items from the questionnaires of Gangloff & Caboux (2003) and Gangloff & Duchon (2008): 12 items of general allegiance and 12 items differentiating the reasons for allegiance (ideological vs. opportunist). Examples: ""With my boss, I rarely try to defend my ideas"" (general allegiance item); “When my boss takes a decision, I rarely challenge it. Whatever the decision: you should not challenge your boss” (ideological allegiance); “Even if my boss's orders sometimes seem absurd to me, as I want to have quick promotions, I generally obey” (opportunistic allegiance). The subjects answered each item by indicating whether, usually, they adopted rather allegiant or rather rebellious conduct, and they specified, in each of the two cases, if this adoption satisfied or dissatisfied them. Considering that satisfaction is a constituent element of well-being, a second questionnaire was used the Scale for Measuring Manifestations of Psychological Well-Being (EMMDEP) by Massé et al. (1998), made up of 25 items in which subjects ticked off as ""somewhat agree"" (rated 1) vs. ""somewhat disagree"" (rated 0). The results show that 1) allegiant conducts are more frequent than rebellious ones, but only among women (among men, the difference is not significant); 2) dissatisfaction is more frequent with adopting allegiant conducts than with adopting rebellious ones, whatever the gender; 3) satisfaction is more frequent than dissatisfaction, both for the allegiant conducts and for the rebels; 4) Satisfied participants express more well-being than unsatisfied participants. The limits and practical consequences of these results will be discussed."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为一个反叛者的满足感
“几项关于组织环境的研究表明,存在忠诚规范;它包括积极地评价那些不仅服从上级命令,而且避免对上级提出任何批评的员工。这里的问题是对采取或拒绝采取这种行为的满意程度和不满意程度。使用滚雪球技术联系了120名阿根廷私营部门雇员(60名男性和60名女性),并在自愿的基础上匿名回答了两份问卷。第一个是来自Gangloff & Caboux(2003)和Gangloff & Duchon(2008)问卷的24个忠诚问卷,其中12个是一般忠诚,12个是区分忠诚原因(意识形态vs机会主义)。例如:“和我的老板在一起时,我很少试图为自己的想法辩护”(一般忠诚项目);“当我的老板做出决定时,我很少挑战它。无论决定是什么:你不应该挑战你的老板”(意识形态上的忠诚);“即使我老板的命令有时对我来说似乎很荒谬,因为我想要快速晋升,我通常都会服从”(机会主义忠诚)。受试者通过表明他们通常采取的是忠诚的行为还是叛逆的行为来回答每一个问题,并且在这两种情况下,他们具体说明这种行为是让他们满意还是不满意。考虑到满意度是幸福的一个组成要素,第二份问卷采用了mass et al.(1998)的心理幸福测量表现量表(EMMDEP),由25个项目组成,其中受试者勾选“有点同意”(评分1)vs。“有些不同意”(0分)。结果表明:1)忠贞行为比叛逆行为更频繁,但只在女性中出现(在男性中差异不显著);2)无论性别如何,采取忠诚行为比采取叛逆行为更容易引起不满;3)不论是对忠诚的行为还是对叛逆的行为,满意都比不满意更频繁;4)满意的参与者比不满意的参与者表现出更多的幸福感。我们将讨论这些结果的局限性和实际后果。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LINKING MODAL AND AMODAL REPRESENTATIONS THROUGH LANGUAGE COMPUTATIONAL MODELS CLINICAL ASSESSMENT IN A PROFESSIONAL SETTING: ARE THERE IMPLICATIONS FOR SELF-REPORTS OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY? MALADAPTIVE COGNITIONS AND EMOTIONAL REGULATION IN PTSD DOES VACCINE SCARCITY INFLUENCE THE EFFECT OF CONSPIRACY BELIEFS ON INTENTION TO VACCINATE AGAINST COVID-19? SOURCES OF TRANSITION-TO-WORK SELF-EFFICACY: CAREER EXPLORATION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1