Epistemic Markers in NS and NNS Academic Writing

Tim Vandenhoek
{"title":"Epistemic Markers in NS and NNS Academic Writing","authors":"Tim Vandenhoek","doi":"10.18552/JOAW.V8I1.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of epistemic markers – words and phrases employed to show differing degrees of certainty and hesitation – is an important element of academic writing. Previous research has suggested that this is an area in which non-native speakers (NNS) struggle. Studies have indicated that NNS are prone to making overly strong statements and exhibit less range and sophistication in the devices that they do employ than native speakers (NS). However, there have as yet been few studies examining the use of such language by advanced NNS students in university academic writing. This corpus-based study examines the ways in which NS and advanced NNS students use epistemic markers in university academic writing. Two corpora totalling 31 659 words were formed from the discussion and conclusion sections of a written university assignment and analyzed for use of epistemic markers. The results indicate that though both groups employ the language at comparable rates and display similar levels of commitment in their writing, these NNS writers display some features of epistemic marker use found to be generally characteristic of other NNS writers.","PeriodicalId":202793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Writing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/JOAW.V8I1.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The use of epistemic markers – words and phrases employed to show differing degrees of certainty and hesitation – is an important element of academic writing. Previous research has suggested that this is an area in which non-native speakers (NNS) struggle. Studies have indicated that NNS are prone to making overly strong statements and exhibit less range and sophistication in the devices that they do employ than native speakers (NS). However, there have as yet been few studies examining the use of such language by advanced NNS students in university academic writing. This corpus-based study examines the ways in which NS and advanced NNS students use epistemic markers in university academic writing. Two corpora totalling 31 659 words were formed from the discussion and conclusion sections of a written university assignment and analyzed for use of epistemic markers. The results indicate that though both groups employ the language at comparable rates and display similar levels of commitment in their writing, these NNS writers display some features of epistemic marker use found to be generally characteristic of other NNS writers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络科学与网络科学学术写作中的认知标记
认识论标记——用来表示不同程度的确定和犹豫的单词和短语——的使用是学术写作的一个重要元素。先前的研究表明,这是非母语人士(NNS)难以做到的。研究表明,与母语人士相比,英语母语人士倾向于发表过于强烈的言论,并且在使用的措辞上表现出较少的范围和复杂性。然而,目前还很少有研究调查高级神经科学专业学生在大学学术写作中使用这种语言。这项基于语料库的研究考察了NNS和高级NNS学生在大学学术写作中使用认知标记的方式。从大学书面作业的讨论部分和结论部分组成了两个语料库,共31659个单词,并分析了认知标记的使用。结果表明,尽管两组人都以相当的比率使用这种语言,并且在写作中表现出相似的投入水平,但这些NNS作者在使用认知标记方面表现出一些特征,这些特征被发现是其他NNS作者的普遍特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Should Digital Tools for Writing be Evaluated? Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics Written notes and listening comprehension: A correlation study The Power Hour of Writing: An empirical evaluation of our online writing community On the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction A Palimpsest of Practice-led Inquiry: A Conversation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1