In Search of Informed Discretion (Revisited): Are Managers Concerned about Appearing Selfish?

Bart Dierynck, Jesse van der Geest, Victor van Pelt
{"title":"In Search of Informed Discretion (Revisited): Are Managers Concerned about Appearing Selfish?","authors":"Bart Dierynck, Jesse van der Geest, Victor van Pelt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3736930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve the quality of performance evaluation and compensation decisions, managers can undertake costly searches for additional information about employees’ individual contributions to performance. Prior accounting research documents that managers are willing to undertake these costly information searches because they have social preferences (i.e., distributional fairness and reciprocity). However, our experimental results show that managers are significantly less willing to undertake costly information searches when the situation allows them to make fewer negative inferences when acting selfishly. Our findings are consistent with predictions rooted in behavioral economics and social psychology that even self-interested people exhibit prosocial behavior in some situations because they have concerns about appearing selfish toward themselves and others. We conclude that creating working conditions that increase managers’ concerns about their self-image may prompt them to make informed performance evaluation and compensation decisions.","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3736930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve the quality of performance evaluation and compensation decisions, managers can undertake costly searches for additional information about employees’ individual contributions to performance. Prior accounting research documents that managers are willing to undertake these costly information searches because they have social preferences (i.e., distributional fairness and reciprocity). However, our experimental results show that managers are significantly less willing to undertake costly information searches when the situation allows them to make fewer negative inferences when acting selfishly. Our findings are consistent with predictions rooted in behavioral economics and social psychology that even self-interested people exhibit prosocial behavior in some situations because they have concerns about appearing selfish toward themselves and others. We conclude that creating working conditions that increase managers’ concerns about their self-image may prompt them to make informed performance evaluation and compensation decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻求知情的自由裁量权(重访):管理者是否担心自己显得自私?
为了提高绩效评估和薪酬决策的质量,管理人员可以花费大量资金,寻找有关员工个人对绩效贡献的额外信息。先前的会计研究证明,管理者愿意承担这些昂贵的信息搜索,因为他们有社会偏好(即分配公平和互惠)。然而,我们的实验结果表明,当情况允许管理者在自私行为时做出更少的负面推断时,他们明显不愿意进行昂贵的信息搜索。我们的研究结果与行为经济学和社会心理学的预测相一致,即即使是自私自利的人在某些情况下也会表现出亲社会行为,因为他们担心对自己和他人显得自私。我们的结论是,创造工作条件,增加管理者对自我形象的关注,可能会促使他们做出明智的绩效评估和薪酬决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunity and Inequality Across Generations Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates The Role of Effort Cost Perception in Outcome Bias (Mis-)Perception of Inequality: Measures, Determinants, and Consequences Dynamic Resource Allocation with Cost Externality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1