A comparative study of the reproductive success of Theobroma Cacao L (malvaceae) undernatural and manual pollination

Oduro, Owusu Ansah, Adu Bredu
{"title":"A comparative study of the reproductive success of Theobroma Cacao L (malvaceae) undernatural and manual pollination","authors":"Oduro, Owusu Ansah, Adu Bredu","doi":"10.15406/hij.2021.05.00229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reproductive successes under natural and manual pollination were assessed. Two cocoa farms around Bobiri Forest Reserve, in the Ejisu-Juabeng District Ghana were purposively selected. Fifteen percent of open flowers from five selected cocoa trees were subjected to manual-pollination and total exclusion. Ninety pods under natural pollination were compared with ninety pods under manually pollination. Proximate analysis was carried out to evaluate the macronutrients of cocoa pod and seeds produced under the two pollination modes. Results show that pollinator exclusion significantly decreased fruit set (df=2, X2 =12.5, P=0.00) and flower set (df= 2, F=25.2, P=0.00) (P=0.00). Pod weights and seed numbers significantly differed (V=0.049, F (4.49)=0.986, p<0.01, eta squared=0.049) irrespective of pod size and mode of pollination, however, there were individual differences. Weights of small pods did not differ (p>0.05) under the two pollination regimes, however, weights of medium size pods (p < 0.05) and that of the large pods (<0.05) produced under the two regimes of pollination differed. Number of beans and the size of pods did not differ under the two modes of pollination. Linear relationship existed between weight (y) and seed number (x) of individual pods: Y=18.56 + 0.016x; R2 =0.45. Macronutrients of pods and seeds did not differ (paired t test= 4.08, 29 d. f.; P=0.12) under the two pollination mode. The study concluded that natural pollination contributed to cocoa production.","PeriodicalId":108819,"journal":{"name":"Horticulture International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horticulture International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/hij.2021.05.00229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reproductive successes under natural and manual pollination were assessed. Two cocoa farms around Bobiri Forest Reserve, in the Ejisu-Juabeng District Ghana were purposively selected. Fifteen percent of open flowers from five selected cocoa trees were subjected to manual-pollination and total exclusion. Ninety pods under natural pollination were compared with ninety pods under manually pollination. Proximate analysis was carried out to evaluate the macronutrients of cocoa pod and seeds produced under the two pollination modes. Results show that pollinator exclusion significantly decreased fruit set (df=2, X2 =12.5, P=0.00) and flower set (df= 2, F=25.2, P=0.00) (P=0.00). Pod weights and seed numbers significantly differed (V=0.049, F (4.49)=0.986, p<0.01, eta squared=0.049) irrespective of pod size and mode of pollination, however, there were individual differences. Weights of small pods did not differ (p>0.05) under the two pollination regimes, however, weights of medium size pods (p < 0.05) and that of the large pods (<0.05) produced under the two regimes of pollination differed. Number of beans and the size of pods did not differ under the two modes of pollination. Linear relationship existed between weight (y) and seed number (x) of individual pods: Y=18.56 + 0.016x; R2 =0.45. Macronutrients of pods and seeds did not differ (paired t test= 4.08, 29 d. f.; P=0.12) under the two pollination mode. The study concluded that natural pollination contributed to cocoa production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非自然授粉与人工授粉对可可树繁殖成功率的比较研究
对自然授粉和人工授粉下的繁殖成功率进行了评价。加纳Ejisu-Juabeng地区Bobiri森林保护区附近的两个可可农场被有意选中。从五棵选定的可可树中,15%的开放花朵被人工授粉,完全被排除在外。自然授粉与人工授粉的荚果数分别为90个和90个。对两种授粉方式下生产的可可豆荚和种子的宏量营养素进行了近似分析。结果表明:排除传粉者显著降低了果实坐果(df=2, X2 =12.5, P=0.00)和花坐果(df=2, F=25.2, P=0.00)。两种授粉方式产生的荚果重和种子数差异显著(V=0.049, F (4.49)=0.986, p0.05),但两种授粉方式产生的中粒荚果重差异显著(p <0.05),大粒荚果重差异显著(p <0.05)。在两种授粉方式下,豆粒数和豆荚大小没有差异。单荚重量(y)与种子数(x)呈线性关系:y =18.56 + 0.016x;R2 = 0.45。豆荚和种子的常量营养素含量无显著差异(配对t检验= 4.08,29 d. f;P=0.12)。该研究得出结论,自然授粉有助于可可产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A brief reflection on the banana and avocado crops in Tanzania In vitro conservation of hops – Cascade and Nugget cultivar under slow-growing conditions Euphorbia heterophylla Linn. (Wild poinsettia), a weed that deserves to be tamed and not eliminated Pruning as a production factor of the cacao tree (Theobroma cacao l.) Mycoparasitic evaluation of native strains of Trichoderma spp. against Verticillium dahliae from the province of Catamarca (Argentinian Republic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1