Konstruksi Realitas Pemberitaan Kebijakan Vaksinasi Berbayar Di Portal Berita Online

Yona Voria Janesia
{"title":"Konstruksi Realitas Pemberitaan Kebijakan Vaksinasi Berbayar Di Portal Berita Online","authors":"Yona Voria Janesia","doi":"10.51544/jlmk.v6i1.2431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the framing of the news regarding the paid vaccination policy or “Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)” in Republika Online and Tempo.co. This research is a qualitative research with a constructionist paradigm. The research method used is framing analysis by Robert N. Entman. The framing of Republika Online and Tempo.co news is analyzed through four framing elements, which are problem definition, determining the cause of the problem, making moral decisions, and emphasizing problem solving. The result shows that Republika Online and Tempo.co construct the issue of paid vaccination policy with different framing. Republika Online constructed a paid vaccination policy as a strategic and rational effort to deal with Covid-19. Meanwhile, Tempo.co framed the issue of the paid vaccination policy as a polemic that drew a lot of criticism and rejection. The discourse strategies used by the two media can be observed through the way journalists choose diction, writing headlines, selecting sources, and the body of the news as a whole.","PeriodicalId":112384,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51544/jlmk.v6i1.2431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to determine the framing of the news regarding the paid vaccination policy or “Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)” in Republika Online and Tempo.co. This research is a qualitative research with a constructionist paradigm. The research method used is framing analysis by Robert N. Entman. The framing of Republika Online and Tempo.co news is analyzed through four framing elements, which are problem definition, determining the cause of the problem, making moral decisions, and emphasizing problem solving. The result shows that Republika Online and Tempo.co construct the issue of paid vaccination policy with different framing. Republika Online constructed a paid vaccination policy as a strategic and rational effort to deal with Covid-19. Meanwhile, Tempo.co framed the issue of the paid vaccination policy as a polemic that drew a lot of criticism and rejection. The discourse strategies used by the two media can be observed through the way journalists choose diction, writing headlines, selecting sources, and the body of the news as a whole.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在在线新闻门户网站上建立付费疫苗接种政策的宣传现实
本研究旨在确定共和国在线和Tempo.co中关于付费疫苗接种政策或“Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)”的新闻框架。本研究是一种建构主义范式的质性研究。采用的研究方法是Robert N. Entman的框架分析。《共和国在线》和《节奏》的框架。本文通过问题定义、确定问题原因、做出道德决策和强调解决问题四个框架要素来分析新闻。结果表明,《共和在线》和《节奏》。共同构建不同框架下的付费接种政策问题。共和国在线构建了付费疫苗接种政策,作为应对Covid-19的战略性和理性努力。与此同时,节奏。Co将付费疫苗接种政策的问题描述为一场引发了大量批评和拒绝的论战。两种媒体使用的话语策略可以通过记者选择措辞、撰写标题、选择来源和整个新闻主体的方式来观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advertisement Exposure and Investment Interest: Study on Octafx Advertising Trading Platform among Students Digital Marketing Among the Millennials Generation of MSMEs in Serdang Bedagai Regency Marketing Communication in Attracting Students Youth Political Expression Through Tiktok Social Media Disrupsi Fungsi Media Baru: Sebuah Studi Kasus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1