Effect of pharmacotherapy on fibromyalgia: an overview of systematic reviews

A. T. Costa, Renata Ferraz Figueiredo, R. O. Silva, Tatiana Rodrigues da Silva, T. Alcantara, M. Serafini, D. P. L. Lyra Junior, C. B. Walker
{"title":"Effect of pharmacotherapy on fibromyalgia: an overview of systematic reviews","authors":"A. T. Costa, Renata Ferraz Figueiredo, R. O. Silva, Tatiana Rodrigues da Silva, T. Alcantara, M. Serafini, D. P. L. Lyra Junior, C. B. Walker","doi":"10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v29i3a178254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fibromyalgia is a debilitating and chronic pain processing disorder, in which the proportion of patients who achieve good results with pharmacotherapy is small. However, choosing the best available evidence on pharmacotherapy can optimize patient clinical outcomes. Objective: This overview aimed to identify in systematic reviews the effects of pharmacotherapy on fibromyalgia, considering the quality of the reviews and the efficacy of the outcomes. Methods: This search was performed in seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, COCHRANE, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus and IPA. The methodological quality was evaluated using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018095943). Results: A total of 63 systematic reviews were selected after reading full texts, but only 8 of them were of moderate to high quality and were included in this overview. All included reviews were published in English, between 2012 and 2018, performed meta-analysis, used the American College of Rheumatology (1990) diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia, and jointly assessed pain improvement, adverse reactions, and withdrawal. Most reviews included only randomized controlled trials. Of the fourteen drugs addressed in systematic reviews evaluated, duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin showed evidence of improvement in pain (Moderate:≤30%) and other fibromyalgia symptoms, as depression and fatigue. However, these medications presented significant withdrawals due to adverse reactions (mainly nausea, headache, dizziness and constipation). The rate of treatment withdrawal reached 36%. Conclusion: Few studies have high quality and sufficient evidence on the effect of medicines on fibromyalgia, resulting in a lack of support for prescribers to choose drugs that meet criteria for need, effectiveness, safety and compliance.","PeriodicalId":246306,"journal":{"name":"Acta Fisiátrica","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Fisiátrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v29i3a178254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a debilitating and chronic pain processing disorder, in which the proportion of patients who achieve good results with pharmacotherapy is small. However, choosing the best available evidence on pharmacotherapy can optimize patient clinical outcomes. Objective: This overview aimed to identify in systematic reviews the effects of pharmacotherapy on fibromyalgia, considering the quality of the reviews and the efficacy of the outcomes. Methods: This search was performed in seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, COCHRANE, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus and IPA. The methodological quality was evaluated using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018095943). Results: A total of 63 systematic reviews were selected after reading full texts, but only 8 of them were of moderate to high quality and were included in this overview. All included reviews were published in English, between 2012 and 2018, performed meta-analysis, used the American College of Rheumatology (1990) diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia, and jointly assessed pain improvement, adverse reactions, and withdrawal. Most reviews included only randomized controlled trials. Of the fourteen drugs addressed in systematic reviews evaluated, duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin showed evidence of improvement in pain (Moderate:≤30%) and other fibromyalgia symptoms, as depression and fatigue. However, these medications presented significant withdrawals due to adverse reactions (mainly nausea, headache, dizziness and constipation). The rate of treatment withdrawal reached 36%. Conclusion: Few studies have high quality and sufficient evidence on the effect of medicines on fibromyalgia, resulting in a lack of support for prescribers to choose drugs that meet criteria for need, effectiveness, safety and compliance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物治疗对纤维肌痛的影响:系统综述
纤维肌痛是一种使人衰弱的慢性疼痛加工障碍,其中通过药物治疗取得良好效果的患者比例很小。然而,选择药物治疗的最佳证据可以优化患者的临床结果。目的:本综述旨在确定药物治疗对纤维肌痛的影响,考虑到综述的质量和结果的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、COCHRANE、Lilacs、Embase、Scopus和IPA等7个数据库。使用评估系统评价的测量工具评估方法学质量2。该协议已在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42018095943)中注册。结果:在阅读全文后,共选择了63篇系统综述,但其中只有8篇是中等到高质量的系统综述被纳入本综述。所有纳入的综述均在2012年至2018年间以英文发表,采用美国风湿病学会(1990)纤维肌痛诊断标准进行了荟萃分析,并联合评估了疼痛改善、不良反应和戒断。大多数综述只包括随机对照试验。在系统评价中涉及的14种药物中,度洛西汀、米那西普兰和普瑞巴林显示出疼痛(中度:≤30%)和其他纤维肌痛症状(如抑郁和疲劳)改善的证据。然而,由于不良反应(主要是恶心、头痛、头晕和便秘),这些药物出现了严重的停药。停药率达36%。结论:关于药物治疗纤维肌痛的疗效,很少有高质量和足够证据的研究,导致开处方者选择符合需求、有效性、安全性和依从性标准的药物缺乏支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Autopercepção dos benefícios da mobilização miofascial em praticantes de exercício físico: um estudo transversal Influência do tratamento fisioterapêutico na independência funcional de pessoas com hemofilia submetidas à sinovectomia radioativa Efeito imediato da mobilização com movimento (MWM) em pacientes com dor lombar: um estudo randomizado controlado Uso da modelagem de equações estruturais na compreensão da incapacidade funcional de idosos com catarata autorreferida Associação de estimulação por ondas de choque a toxina botulínica e baclofeno durante a reabilitação de paciente com lesão medular e trauma cranioencefálico: relato de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1