The Impact of Knowledge Management and Change Readiness on the Effectiveness: Case of Russian Organizations

Yuri Zelenkov
{"title":"The Impact of Knowledge Management and Change Readiness on the Effectiveness: Case of Russian Organizations","authors":"Yuri Zelenkov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3192286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many researchers believe that knowledge is the most important resource in the contemporary economy, but empirical studies show that knowledge management is not among the most used managerial tools. This gap can be explained by help the hypothesis that knowledge management produces the significant impact on the effectiveness of organization only with the accompanying development of change management. This hypothesis is empirically tested using the structural equation modeling method (PLS-SEM) on data on 103 Russian organizations. The results show that the empirical sample includes two statistically different datasets. The separating variable is the type of owner, so separate models were built for state-owned and private-owned organizations. For private-owned organizations, the hypothesis that knowledge management and changes readiness jointly affect effectiveness is fully confirmed. For state-owned organizations, knowledge management is not a factor of effectiveness. These results have two practical implications. First, managers who rely on the organizational knowledge should focus on the joint and coordinated implementation of knowledge management and change management. Special attention should be paid to the organizational context that supports individual change readiness. Second, state-owned organizations in Russia are less effective rather private ones, it is due to the fact that knowledge management for them is not the factor of effectiveness, what is a consequence of suppression of initiatives at the individual level.","PeriodicalId":212698,"journal":{"name":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3192286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many researchers believe that knowledge is the most important resource in the contemporary economy, but empirical studies show that knowledge management is not among the most used managerial tools. This gap can be explained by help the hypothesis that knowledge management produces the significant impact on the effectiveness of organization only with the accompanying development of change management. This hypothesis is empirically tested using the structural equation modeling method (PLS-SEM) on data on 103 Russian organizations. The results show that the empirical sample includes two statistically different datasets. The separating variable is the type of owner, so separate models were built for state-owned and private-owned organizations. For private-owned organizations, the hypothesis that knowledge management and changes readiness jointly affect effectiveness is fully confirmed. For state-owned organizations, knowledge management is not a factor of effectiveness. These results have two practical implications. First, managers who rely on the organizational knowledge should focus on the joint and coordinated implementation of knowledge management and change management. Special attention should be paid to the organizational context that supports individual change readiness. Second, state-owned organizations in Russia are less effective rather private ones, it is due to the fact that knowledge management for them is not the factor of effectiveness, what is a consequence of suppression of initiatives at the individual level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识管理和变革准备对组织有效性的影响:以俄罗斯组织为例
许多研究者认为知识是当代经济中最重要的资源,但实证研究表明,知识管理并不是最常用的管理工具之一。这一差距可以用知识管理只有伴随着变革管理的发展才会对组织的有效性产生显著影响的假设来解释。利用结构方程建模方法(PLS-SEM)对103个俄罗斯组织的数据进行了实证检验。结果表明,实证样本包含两个统计上不同的数据集。分离变量为所有者类型,因此分别建立了国有和民营组织的模型。对于私有组织,知识管理和变革准备共同影响有效性的假设得到了充分的证实。对于国有企业来说,知识管理并不是一个有效的因素。这些结果有两个实际意义。首先,依靠组织知识的管理者应注重知识管理与变革管理的联合协调实施。应该特别注意支持个人变更准备的组织环境。其次,俄罗斯国有组织的效率比私营组织低,这是因为知识管理对他们来说不是效率的因素,这是在个人层面上抑制主动性的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creativity and Corporate Culture Debiasing as a Powerful Management Accounting Tool? Evidence from German Firms The Analysis of Relationship Among Transformational Leadership Style and Performance of Personnel by Mediation Role of Organizational Culture Autonomy at Work in the Gig Economy: Analysing Work Status, Work Content and Working Conditions of Independent Professionals An Evidence-Based Model for Agile Organizational Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1