Localised Trust in a Globalised Knot: Designing Information Privacy for Digital-ID

S. Van Staden, N. Bidwell
{"title":"Localised Trust in a Globalised Knot: Designing Information Privacy for Digital-ID","authors":"S. Van Staden, N. Bidwell","doi":"10.1145/3616024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We designed the system to manage, verify and exchange identity information for Namibia's national Digital-ID. We applied Grounded Theory methods to five focus groups to understand experiences, expectations and practices in different contexts of legal identity verification and sharing. Local perspectives on privacy aligned with prevalent models for Digital-ID, in which people individually own and trade their personal information, yet they cannot be disentangled from specific social relationships. Thus, our design responds to the ways people establish trust with organisations over time and relate consent for information exchange and privacy control to accountability. We used Situational Analysis to consider how data governance is constructed in a policy-design-adoption ‘knot’ and relates to Namibia's sociotechnical imaginary of ‘unity in diversity’. Unequal telecommunications access and adoption contributes to systems that produce inegalitarian data relations but is not central in Namibia's data protection and privacy discourse, thus our thick analysis prompted designing to strengthen collective voice in governance through Government Gazettes and civil society activism. Our reflections also suggest that while design research of a real-world system in Africa offers important insights about combining individualist and collectivist orientations in data governance, their wider scholarly contribution is impeded by norms imposed by the Global North.","PeriodicalId":238057,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3616024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We designed the system to manage, verify and exchange identity information for Namibia's national Digital-ID. We applied Grounded Theory methods to five focus groups to understand experiences, expectations and practices in different contexts of legal identity verification and sharing. Local perspectives on privacy aligned with prevalent models for Digital-ID, in which people individually own and trade their personal information, yet they cannot be disentangled from specific social relationships. Thus, our design responds to the ways people establish trust with organisations over time and relate consent for information exchange and privacy control to accountability. We used Situational Analysis to consider how data governance is constructed in a policy-design-adoption ‘knot’ and relates to Namibia's sociotechnical imaginary of ‘unity in diversity’. Unequal telecommunications access and adoption contributes to systems that produce inegalitarian data relations but is not central in Namibia's data protection and privacy discourse, thus our thick analysis prompted designing to strengthen collective voice in governance through Government Gazettes and civil society activism. Our reflections also suggest that while design research of a real-world system in Africa offers important insights about combining individualist and collectivist orientations in data governance, their wider scholarly contribution is impeded by norms imposed by the Global North.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化结中的局部信任:数字身份信息隐私设计
我们设计了这个系统来管理、验证和交换纳米比亚国家数字身份证的身份信息。我们将扎根理论的方法应用于五个焦点小组,以了解不同背景下法律身份验证和共享的经验、期望和实践。当地对隐私的看法与数字身份的流行模式一致,在这种模式下,人们个人拥有和交易他们的个人信息,但他们无法从特定的社会关系中解脱出来。因此,我们的设计响应了人们随着时间的推移与组织建立信任的方式,并将信息交换和隐私控制的同意与问责制联系起来。我们使用情景分析来考虑数据治理是如何在政策设计-采用的“结”中构建的,并与纳米比亚“多样性中的统一”的社会技术想象有关。不平等的电信接入和采用导致系统产生不平等的数据关系,但不是纳米比亚数据保护和隐私话语的核心,因此我们的深入分析促使设计通过政府公报和民间社会行动来加强治理中的集体声音。我们的反思还表明,尽管对非洲现实世界系统的设计研究为将个人主义和集体主义取向结合起来进行数据治理提供了重要见解,但它们更广泛的学术贡献受到了全球北方强加的规范的阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What's Up On The Roof: Tracking Cool Roofs in India with Satellite Imaging Examining Factors Influencing Technology Integration in Indian Classrooms: A Teachers' Perspective Experiences from Running a Voice-Based Education Platform for Children and Teachers with Visual Impairments Shadow Program Committee: Designing for Diversity and Equity within Academic Communities Flamingo: Environmental Impact Factor Matching for Life Cycle Assessment with Zero-Shot Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1