Forecasting of COVID-19 Pandemic Using ARIMA and Fb-Prophet Models: UK Case Study

Victor Chang, Oghara Akpomedaye, V. Jesus, Qi Xu, Karl Hall, Meghana Ganatra
{"title":"Forecasting of COVID-19 Pandemic Using ARIMA and Fb-Prophet Models: UK Case Study","authors":"Victor Chang, Oghara Akpomedaye, V. Jesus, Qi Xu, Karl Hall, Meghana Ganatra","doi":"10.5220/0011990300003485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide insights into predicting future cases of COVID-19 infection and rates of virus transmission in the UK by critically analyzing and visualizing historical COVID-19 data, so that healthcare providers can prepare ahead of time. In order to achieve this goal, the study invested in the existing studies and selected ARIMA and Fb-Prophet time series models as the methods to predict confirmed and death cases in the following year. In a comparison of both models using values of their evaluation metrics, root-mean-square error, mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error show that ARIMA performs better than Fb-Prophet. The study also discusses the reasons for the dramatic spike in mortality and the large drop in deaths shown in the results, contributing to the literature on health analytics and COVID-19 by validating the results of related studies. Copyright © 2023 by SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)","PeriodicalId":414016,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0011990300003485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to provide insights into predicting future cases of COVID-19 infection and rates of virus transmission in the UK by critically analyzing and visualizing historical COVID-19 data, so that healthcare providers can prepare ahead of time. In order to achieve this goal, the study invested in the existing studies and selected ARIMA and Fb-Prophet time series models as the methods to predict confirmed and death cases in the following year. In a comparison of both models using values of their evaluation metrics, root-mean-square error, mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error show that ARIMA performs better than Fb-Prophet. The study also discusses the reasons for the dramatic spike in mortality and the large drop in deaths shown in the results, contributing to the literature on health analytics and COVID-19 by validating the results of related studies. Copyright © 2023 by SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用ARIMA和Fb-Prophet模型预测COVID-19大流行:英国案例研究
本研究旨在通过批判性分析和可视化历史COVID-19数据,为预测英国未来的COVID-19感染病例和病毒传播率提供见解,以便医疗保健提供者提前做好准备。为了实现这一目标,本研究对现有研究进行了投资,选择ARIMA和Fb-Prophet时间序列模型作为预测次年确诊病例和死亡病例的方法。通过对两种模型的评价指标的值进行比较,均方根误差、平均绝对误差和平均绝对百分比误差表明,ARIMA的性能优于Fb-Prophet。该研究还讨论了结果中死亡率急剧上升和死亡率大幅下降的原因,通过验证相关研究的结果,为卫生分析和COVID-19的文献做出了贡献。版权所有©2023 SCITEPRESS -科学技术出版社,Lda。CC授权(CC by - nc - nd4.0)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moving Other Way: Exploring Word Mover Distance Extensions Artificial Neural Networks Jamming on the Beat FLOPTICS: A Novel Automated Gating Technique for Flow Cytometry Data It Means More if It Sounds Good: Yet Another Hypotheses Concerning the Evolution of Polysemous Words An Empirical Research on the Investment Strategy of Stock Market based on Deep Reinforcement Learning model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1