{"title":"An infeasible interior point methods for convex quadratic problems","authors":"H. Roumili, N. Boudjellal","doi":"10.33993/jnaat472-1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we deal with the study and implementation of an infeasible interior point method for convex quadratic problems (CQP). The algorithm uses a Newton step and suitable proximity measure for approximately tracing the central path and guarantees that after one feasibility step, the new iterate is feasible and suciently close to the central path. For its complexity analysis, we reconsider the analysis used by the authors for linear optimisation (LO) and linear complementarity problems (LCP). \nWe show that the algorithm has the best known iteration bound, namely \\(n log (n+1)\\). \nFinally, to measure the numerical performance of this algorithm, it was tested on convex quadratic and linear problems.","PeriodicalId":287022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/jnaat472-1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper, we deal with the study and implementation of an infeasible interior point method for convex quadratic problems (CQP). The algorithm uses a Newton step and suitable proximity measure for approximately tracing the central path and guarantees that after one feasibility step, the new iterate is feasible and suciently close to the central path. For its complexity analysis, we reconsider the analysis used by the authors for linear optimisation (LO) and linear complementarity problems (LCP).
We show that the algorithm has the best known iteration bound, namely \(n log (n+1)\).
Finally, to measure the numerical performance of this algorithm, it was tested on convex quadratic and linear problems.