Western Theories of the Contemporary Community: Focusing on Inoperative Community and the Coming Community

Dae-joong Kim
{"title":"Western Theories of the Contemporary Community: Focusing on Inoperative Community and the Coming Community","authors":"Dae-joong Kim","doi":"10.19116/theory.2022.27.3.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay aims to explore genealogy of community in the contemporary western theories focusing on two major European scholars’ theories of community: Jean-Luc Nancy’s ‘the inoperative community’ and Giorgio Agamben’s ‘the coming community.’ In the history of contemporary theories, Georges Bataille, a French philosopher, contextualizing communication and community, first proposed the idea of ‘Unavowable Community’ which influenced Jean-Luc Nancy’s idea of inoperative community. The inoperative community refuses identity politics and immanence to delineate a community where singular subject, going through desubjectification, take part in unrecognizable community expurgating any violence or drive for death. Nancy metaphysically critiques limit of the idea of community and suggests inoperative community as a metaphysically fundamental community. Though sounding purely ethical, Nancy’s community is product of the collapse of communism and resistance against totalitarian or capitalistic desire for unified community. In turn, the essay delves into complicated ideas of coming community in Giorgio Agamben’s The Coming Community. Agamben, inheriting as well as critiquing Nancy’s inoperative community, proposes ‘potentiality’ and ‘ease’ as the key elements of coming community in which political theology and ethico-ontology center the idea of community of singularity and coming politics.","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2022.27.3.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay aims to explore genealogy of community in the contemporary western theories focusing on two major European scholars’ theories of community: Jean-Luc Nancy’s ‘the inoperative community’ and Giorgio Agamben’s ‘the coming community.’ In the history of contemporary theories, Georges Bataille, a French philosopher, contextualizing communication and community, first proposed the idea of ‘Unavowable Community’ which influenced Jean-Luc Nancy’s idea of inoperative community. The inoperative community refuses identity politics and immanence to delineate a community where singular subject, going through desubjectification, take part in unrecognizable community expurgating any violence or drive for death. Nancy metaphysically critiques limit of the idea of community and suggests inoperative community as a metaphysically fundamental community. Though sounding purely ethical, Nancy’s community is product of the collapse of communism and resistance against totalitarian or capitalistic desire for unified community. In turn, the essay delves into complicated ideas of coming community in Giorgio Agamben’s The Coming Community. Agamben, inheriting as well as critiquing Nancy’s inoperative community, proposes ‘potentiality’ and ‘ease’ as the key elements of coming community in which political theology and ethico-ontology center the idea of community of singularity and coming politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西方当代社区理论:以失活社区与未来社区为中心
本文旨在探索家谱的当代西方社会理论关注两个主要欧洲学者的理论的社区:jean - luc南希的不起作用的社会”,乔治•阿冈本的未来社会。在当代的历史理论,借,法国哲学家中将沟通和社区,首次提出的概念“Unavowable社区”,影响jean - luc南希的不起作用的理念。无效社区拒绝身份政治和内在性来描绘一个社区,在这个社区中,单一的主体通过去主体化,参与到不可识别的社区中,消除任何暴力或对死亡的驱使。南希从形而上学的角度批判了共同体观念的局限性,并提出无效共同体是一种形而上学的基本共同体。虽然南希的社区听起来纯粹是道德的,但它是共产主义崩溃的产物,是对极权主义或资本主义对统一社区的渴望的反抗。接着,本文对阿甘本《即将到来的社区》中关于即将到来的社区的复杂思想进行了探讨。阿甘本继承并批判了南希的无效共同体,提出“潜能”和“安逸”是未来共同体的关键要素,政治神学和伦理本体论以奇点共同体和未来政治为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Everything, Everywhere, All at Once in the Deleuzean Light of Pure Becoming and Affect On the Creative Evolution of Modern Literature:Reading Austerlitz Revisiting the Realism/Modernism Debate: Marxist Thought and the Ethics of Representation Huxley’s Vision of Gender Utopia and the Philosopher-Ruled State in The Brave New World Judith Butler and the Ethics and Politic of Bodies: Vulnerability, Precarity, and Open Solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1