Ratcheting, Competition, and the Diffusion of Technological Change: The Case of Televisions Under an Energy Efficiency Program

Tomomichi Amano, H. Ohashi
{"title":"Ratcheting, Competition, and the Diffusion of Technological Change: The Case of Televisions Under an Energy Efficiency Program","authors":"Tomomichi Amano, H. Ohashi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3241157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In differentiated goods markets with societal implications, quality standards are commonly implemented to avoid the under-provision of innovation. Firms have clear incentives to engage in strategic behavior because policymakers use market outcomes as a benchmark in designing regulation. This study examines a unique energy efficiency standard for television sets, under which future minimum efficiency standards are explicitly a function of current product offerings. The setting illustrates firms’ dual incentives at work: A firm better differentiates products under a looser standard, but may want to induce a tighter standard if it can benefit from raising rivals’ costs. These incentives drive firms to ratchet quality. We develop a structural model of product entry that illustrates how the regulator’s standard setting rule affects a firm’s product quality decision. Counterfactual simulations illustrate that ratcheting down was prevalent in this market and that incentives to ratchet up did not exist. The results suggest that in many commonly regulated markets in which firms share similar cost structures, firms are likely to experience incentives to ratchet down and delay the introduction of innovative products. The study highlights the importance of understanding supply side incentives, such as ratcheting, in designing and assessing policy.","PeriodicalId":171139,"journal":{"name":"EnergyRN: Energy Efficiency (Topic)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EnergyRN: Energy Efficiency (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In differentiated goods markets with societal implications, quality standards are commonly implemented to avoid the under-provision of innovation. Firms have clear incentives to engage in strategic behavior because policymakers use market outcomes as a benchmark in designing regulation. This study examines a unique energy efficiency standard for television sets, under which future minimum efficiency standards are explicitly a function of current product offerings. The setting illustrates firms’ dual incentives at work: A firm better differentiates products under a looser standard, but may want to induce a tighter standard if it can benefit from raising rivals’ costs. These incentives drive firms to ratchet quality. We develop a structural model of product entry that illustrates how the regulator’s standard setting rule affects a firm’s product quality decision. Counterfactual simulations illustrate that ratcheting down was prevalent in this market and that incentives to ratchet up did not exist. The results suggest that in many commonly regulated markets in which firms share similar cost structures, firms are likely to experience incentives to ratchet down and delay the introduction of innovative products. The study highlights the importance of understanding supply side incentives, such as ratcheting, in designing and assessing policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棘轮、竞争和技术变革的扩散:能源效率计划下电视的案例
在具有社会影响的差异化商品市场中,通常实施质量标准以避免创新供应不足。企业有明确的动机参与战略行为,因为决策者使用市场结果作为设计监管的基准。本研究考察了一种独特的电视机能效标准,在该标准下,未来的最低能效标准是当前产品供应的明确函数。这种情况说明了企业的双重动机在起作用:一个企业在宽松的标准下更好地区分产品,但如果它能从提高竞争对手的成本中获益,它可能希望促使一个更严格的标准。这些激励措施促使企业提高质量。我们开发了一个产品进入的结构模型,说明了监管机构的标准制定规则如何影响公司的产品质量决策。反事实模拟表明,在这个市场中,“棘轮下跌”很普遍,而“棘轮上涨”的动机并不存在。研究结果表明,在许多共同监管的市场中,企业拥有相似的成本结构,企业可能会受到激励,逐步减少和推迟推出创新产品。这项研究强调了在设计和评估政策时,理解供给侧激励(如棘轮)的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Dynamic Loading of the Load-Bearing Structure of a Flat Wagon During Transportation by Sea Are Carbon Leader Indexes Related with Carbon Prices under Different Regimes? Do Habitual Energy Saving Behaviors of Household Heads Impact Energy Consumption in Their Own Dwelling? An Exploration in the French Residential Sector KOSZTY OCHRONY KONSUMENTÓW W ASPEKCIE EFEKTYWNOŚCI I JEJ POMIARU W PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWACH SUBSEKTORA ELEKTROENERGETYCZNEGO (Costs of Consumer Protection in the Aspect of Efficiency and Its Measurement in Enterprises of the Power Sector) IOT Based Energy Efficient Home Automation System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1