Teaching Effect Evaluation System of Ideological and Political Teaching Based on Supervised Learning

Yihao Tian
{"title":"Teaching Effect Evaluation System of Ideological and Political Teaching Based on Supervised Learning","authors":"Yihao Tian","doi":"10.1142/s0219265921470150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University students face immense challenges in current situations in ideological and political research. Therefore, the way ideological work constantly needs to be adapted, and the exchange of advanced experience strengthened to increase ideological and political education (IPE) in universities. Specific methods of university administration may include only ideological and political courses. Courses information and student grades did not conduct an ideological or political evaluation of the student. They assessed the psychological behaviors of the student based on their success, nor did them include clear information on the course schedule for specific ideological and political courses. This article, Supervised learning-based teaching evaluation approach (SL-TEA), has been proposed to focus on supervised learning from ideas about machine learning technology and the current IPE status, to be developed using a brief analysis procedure. Supervised learning uses a practice set to provide the necessary quality through teaching models. Inputs and correct outputs that allow the model to learn over time are part of this training data. The study uses the system of experts to manage, operate and monitor model evaluation data and create a related database for a real-time update. Besides, to check the impact of the model and to run simulation tests. This study SL-TEA model follows the real needs of the system that the ideological and political teaching content of colleges and colleges can be evaluated. Thus, the experimental results show the better performance through the highest student accuracy ratio of 97.1 %, a high-performance ratio of 94.3%, improved political thinking rate of 92.8%, improved actual positive rate of 90.2%, the false-positive rate of 92.2%, enhance learning rate of 96.6% and reduce the error rate 21.2%, compared to other methods.","PeriodicalId":153590,"journal":{"name":"J. Interconnect. Networks","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Interconnect. Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219265921470150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

University students face immense challenges in current situations in ideological and political research. Therefore, the way ideological work constantly needs to be adapted, and the exchange of advanced experience strengthened to increase ideological and political education (IPE) in universities. Specific methods of university administration may include only ideological and political courses. Courses information and student grades did not conduct an ideological or political evaluation of the student. They assessed the psychological behaviors of the student based on their success, nor did them include clear information on the course schedule for specific ideological and political courses. This article, Supervised learning-based teaching evaluation approach (SL-TEA), has been proposed to focus on supervised learning from ideas about machine learning technology and the current IPE status, to be developed using a brief analysis procedure. Supervised learning uses a practice set to provide the necessary quality through teaching models. Inputs and correct outputs that allow the model to learn over time are part of this training data. The study uses the system of experts to manage, operate and monitor model evaluation data and create a related database for a real-time update. Besides, to check the impact of the model and to run simulation tests. This study SL-TEA model follows the real needs of the system that the ideological and political teaching content of colleges and colleges can be evaluated. Thus, the experimental results show the better performance through the highest student accuracy ratio of 97.1 %, a high-performance ratio of 94.3%, improved political thinking rate of 92.8%, improved actual positive rate of 90.2%, the false-positive rate of 92.2%, enhance learning rate of 96.6% and reduce the error rate 21.2%, compared to other methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于监督学习的思想政治教学效果评价体系
在当前形势下,大学生思想政治研究面临着巨大的挑战。因此,不断调整思想政治工作方式,加强先进经验交流,加强高校思想政治教育。大学管理的具体方法可以只包括思想政治课。课程资料和学生成绩没有对学生进行思想政治评价。他们根据学生的成绩来评估他们的心理行为,也没有包括关于具体思想政治课程的课程时间表的明确信息。本文,基于监督学习的教学评价方法(SL-TEA),从机器学习技术的思想和当前的国际政治经济学现状出发,提出了一种基于监督学习的教学评价方法,并将使用一个简短的分析过程来发展。监督式学习使用一套练习集,通过教学模式提供必要的质量。允许模型随时间学习的输入和正确输出是训练数据的一部分。本研究采用专家系统对模型评价数据进行管理、操作和监测,并建立相关数据库进行实时更新。此外,检查模型的影响,并进行模拟测试。本文研究的SL-TEA模型顺应了对高校思想政治教学内容进行评价这一系统的现实需求。因此,实验结果表明,与其他方法相比,该方法的学生最高准确率为97.1%,高效率为94.3%,提高了政治思维率92.8%,提高了实际阳性率90.2%,假阳性率92.2%,提高了学习率96.6%,降低了错误率21.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Efficient and Multi-Tier Node Deployment Strategy Using Variable Tangent Search in an IOT-Fog Environment An Enhanced Probabilistic-Shaped SCMA NOMA for Wireless Networks Energy-Efficient Data Aggregation and Cluster-Based Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Tasmanian Fully Recurrent Deep Learning Network with Pelican Variable Marine Predators Algorithm A Note on Connectivity of Regular Graphs Hyper Star Fault Tolerance of Hierarchical Star Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1