Law & Economics of Banks Corporate Governance in the Bail-In Era

Edoardo D. Martino
{"title":"Law & Economics of Banks Corporate Governance in the Bail-In Era","authors":"Edoardo D. Martino","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3100703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims at introducing an in-depth analysis of Banks Corporate Governance in the after-crisis regulatory environment, going through theoretical and methodological specifications for starting an economic analysis of the post-crisis stream of reforms in the financial system, especially in the Eurozone. \nIn a nutshell, this research has two main purposes: on the one hand, assess whether departures from standard corporate governance paradigms in banks are desirable; on the other hand, shed light on the impact of the rules on the resolution of distressed institutions on governance mechanisms. \nTo achieve those goals, the paper carries out a survey the literature about Bank Governance and Bail-in Regulation in a functional manner to introduce the unexplored link between the new resolution regime and Corporate Governance, focusing the governance role of bail-inable creditors, as “potential residual claimers”. The literature review is supplemented and enriched by the necessary theoretical tools to properly set a Law & Economic analysis, both for what concerns specific agency relationships between corporate constituencies and the nature of financial regulation and bank insolvency. \nThe paper concludes that the after-crisis reforms, and the bail-in regulation, in particular, represent the cornerstone for a new understanding of the relationship between corporate constituencies of banks. Moreover, the links between governance-related issues and the effectiveness of resolution mechanisms constitute a solid argument in favor of a positive role of Corporate Governance in addressing individual as well as systemic stability issues.","PeriodicalId":344099,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3100703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims at introducing an in-depth analysis of Banks Corporate Governance in the after-crisis regulatory environment, going through theoretical and methodological specifications for starting an economic analysis of the post-crisis stream of reforms in the financial system, especially in the Eurozone. In a nutshell, this research has two main purposes: on the one hand, assess whether departures from standard corporate governance paradigms in banks are desirable; on the other hand, shed light on the impact of the rules on the resolution of distressed institutions on governance mechanisms. To achieve those goals, the paper carries out a survey the literature about Bank Governance and Bail-in Regulation in a functional manner to introduce the unexplored link between the new resolution regime and Corporate Governance, focusing the governance role of bail-inable creditors, as “potential residual claimers”. The literature review is supplemented and enriched by the necessary theoretical tools to properly set a Law & Economic analysis, both for what concerns specific agency relationships between corporate constituencies and the nature of financial regulation and bank insolvency. The paper concludes that the after-crisis reforms, and the bail-in regulation, in particular, represent the cornerstone for a new understanding of the relationship between corporate constituencies of banks. Moreover, the links between governance-related issues and the effectiveness of resolution mechanisms constitute a solid argument in favor of a positive role of Corporate Governance in addressing individual as well as systemic stability issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“自救”时代银行公司治理的法律与经济学
本文旨在对危机后监管环境下的银行公司治理进行深入分析,通过理论和方法规范,开始对危机后金融体系改革流进行经济分析,特别是在欧元区。简而言之,本研究有两个主要目的:一方面,评估银行偏离标准公司治理范式是否可取;另一方面,阐明困境机构处置规则对治理机制的影响。为了实现这些目标,本文以一种功能性的方式对有关银行治理和自救监管的文献进行了调查,以引入新的决议制度与公司治理之间未被探索的联系,重点关注可自救债权人作为“潜在剩余索赔人”的治理作用。文献综述补充和丰富了必要的理论工具,以适当地设置法律和经济分析,既涉及公司选区之间的具体代理关系,也涉及金融监管和银行破产的性质。本文的结论是,危机后的改革,特别是内部纾困监管,为重新理解银行企业选区之间的关系奠定了基础。此外,治理相关问题与解决机制有效性之间的联系构成了支持公司治理在解决个人和系统稳定性问题方面发挥积极作用的有力论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monetary Policy in a Low Interest Rate Environment: Reversal Rate and Risk-Taking A Tiering Rule to Balance the Impact of Negative Policy Rates on Banks Optimal Monetary Policy Mix at the Zero Lower Bound The Impacts of Monetary Policy on Banks' Loan Portfolio Risk-taking The Incredible Upside-Down Fixed-Income Market - Negative Interest Rates and Their Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1