Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2016 on the Judgment of 17 September 2015 of the Court of Justice of the EU in the Combined Cases C-10/14, Miljoen, C-14/14, X, and C-17/14, Société Générale, on the Dutch Dividend With-holding Tax

João Félix Pinto Nogueira, Francisco Alfredo Garcia Prats, W. Haslehner, Volker Heydt, E. Kemmeren, G. Kofler, M. Lang, P. Pistone, Stella Raventos-Calvo, Isabelle Richelle, A. Rust, Rupert Shiers
{"title":"Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2016 on the Judgment of 17 September 2015 of the Court of Justice of the EU in the Combined Cases C-10/14, Miljoen, C-14/14, X, and C-17/14, Société Générale, on the Dutch Dividend With-holding Tax","authors":"João Félix Pinto Nogueira, Francisco Alfredo Garcia Prats, W. Haslehner, Volker Heydt, E. Kemmeren, G. Kofler, M. Lang, P. Pistone, Stella Raventos-Calvo, Isabelle Richelle, A. Rust, Rupert Shiers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3644461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the decision taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Miljoen and others (Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14), in respect of which the Third Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 17 September 2015, following the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen of 25 June 2015. The cases concern the taxation of dividends received by individual and corporate non-resident taxpayers. They answer several questions in respect of the appropriateness of levying dividend withholding taxes, such as the need to allow for an offset against ordinary income tax, the deductibility of related costs and the relevance of an offset granted by a tax treaty. After illustrating the factual background, parties' arguments and the ECJ's decision, this Opinion Statement will focus on issues that the ECJ has left open.","PeriodicalId":401648,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3644461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the decision taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Miljoen and others (Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14), in respect of which the Third Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 17 September 2015, following the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen of 25 June 2015. The cases concern the taxation of dividends received by individual and corporate non-resident taxpayers. They answer several questions in respect of the appropriateness of levying dividend withholding taxes, such as the need to allow for an offset against ordinary income tax, the deductibility of related costs and the relevance of an offset granted by a tax treaty. After illustrating the factual background, parties' arguments and the ECJ's decision, this Opinion Statement will focus on issues that the ECJ has left open.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于欧盟法院2015年9月17日关于荷兰股息预扣税的联合案件C-10/14, Miljoen, C-14/14, X,和C-17/14, sociacetsgsamnsirale的判决的意见声明ECJ-TF 1/2016
本文涉及欧盟法院在Miljoen和其他案件(合并案件C-10/14、C-14/14和C-17/14)中作出的决定,欧盟法院(ECJ)第三分庭根据2015年6月25日总检察长Jääskinen的意见,于2015年9月17日作出了决定。这些案例涉及个人和公司非居民纳税人收到的股息的税收。它们回答了关于征收股息预扣税的适当性的几个问题,例如需要允许对普通所得税进行抵扣,有关费用的可扣除性以及税收协定给予抵扣的相关性。在阐述了事实背景、各方观点和欧洲法院的裁决后,本意见声明将重点讨论欧洲法院尚未解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The European Parliament and Brexit Commission v Poland C-562/19 P: Turnover Taxation and State Aid Law Brexit and the Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement The EU Protection of Tax Data Transferred to Third Countries 'Re-Constituting' the Internal Market: Towards a Common Law of International Trade?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1