‘And thou shall find your path’: The Manifesto in Doctoral Writing Development

Tom Muir, K. Solli
{"title":"‘And thou shall find your path’: The Manifesto in Doctoral Writing Development","authors":"Tom Muir, K. Solli","doi":"10.18552/joaw.v12i1.817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If writing pedagogy aims at writer development rather than text fixing, understanding how the writer sees that development is a key element of our skillset as writing teachers. In this article, we argue that a writing manifesto is a way for academic writers to express their development – one that, crucially, draws on semiotic resources outside the usual palette of academic writing. We situate this argument in the literature about reflective writing, which sees reflection as key in writing development, but which also points to the limits of certain kinds of reflective writing. Specifically, several scholars have noted how the reflective essay, traditionally conceived, tends to be constructed of formulaic mappable moves that can obstruct meaningful reflection. By analysing a corpus of manifestos created by doctoral writers, we show how the writers’ use of distinctive semiotic resources – irony, parody, font choice, layout – allow the writers to position themselves as agentive, and present themselves as the makers, not the recipients, of rules about writing. The manifesto, then, is a useful genre for enabling reflection and development because it can create space for writers’ agency and text ownership. Our analysis highlights the value of further discussion about alternate modes of reflective writing.","PeriodicalId":202793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Writing","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v12i1.817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If writing pedagogy aims at writer development rather than text fixing, understanding how the writer sees that development is a key element of our skillset as writing teachers. In this article, we argue that a writing manifesto is a way for academic writers to express their development – one that, crucially, draws on semiotic resources outside the usual palette of academic writing. We situate this argument in the literature about reflective writing, which sees reflection as key in writing development, but which also points to the limits of certain kinds of reflective writing. Specifically, several scholars have noted how the reflective essay, traditionally conceived, tends to be constructed of formulaic mappable moves that can obstruct meaningful reflection. By analysing a corpus of manifestos created by doctoral writers, we show how the writers’ use of distinctive semiotic resources – irony, parody, font choice, layout – allow the writers to position themselves as agentive, and present themselves as the makers, not the recipients, of rules about writing. The manifesto, then, is a useful genre for enabling reflection and development because it can create space for writers’ agency and text ownership. Our analysis highlights the value of further discussion about alternate modes of reflective writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你会找到你的路”:博士写作发展宣言
如果写作教育学的目标是作家的发展而不是文本的固定,那么理解作者如何看待这种发展是我们作为写作教师技能的关键要素。在这篇文章中,我们认为写作宣言是学术作家表达他们发展的一种方式——关键是,它利用了学术写作通常调色板之外的符号学资源。我们将这一论点置于反思性写作的文献中,反思性写作认为反思是写作发展的关键,但也指出了某些类型的反思性写作的局限性。具体来说,一些学者已经注意到反思性文章,传统上认为,往往是由公式化的可映射的动作构成的,这可能会阻碍有意义的反思。通过分析博士作家创作的宣言语料库,我们展示了作者如何使用独特的符号学资源——讽刺、戏仿、字体选择、布局——让作者将自己定位为代理,并将自己呈现为写作规则的创造者,而不是接受者。因此,宣言是一种促进反思和发展的有用体裁,因为它可以为作家的代理和文本所有权创造空间。我们的分析强调了进一步讨论反思性写作的替代模式的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Should Digital Tools for Writing be Evaluated? Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics Written notes and listening comprehension: A correlation study The Power Hour of Writing: An empirical evaluation of our online writing community On the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction A Palimpsest of Practice-led Inquiry: A Conversation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1