Long-Run PPP Under the Presence of Near-to-Unit Roots: The Case of the British Pound-US Dollar Rate

Nikitas Pittis, Sarantis C. Kalyvitis, C. Hassapis
{"title":"Long-Run PPP Under the Presence of Near-to-Unit Roots: The Case of the British Pound-US Dollar Rate","authors":"Nikitas Pittis, Sarantis C. Kalyvitis, C. Hassapis","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00809.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical tests typically provide evidence that the British pound-US dollar exchange rate and the relative wholesale price index contain exact unit roots and exhibit cointegration. However, the cointegrating vector is significantly different from [1, - 1], thus raising doubts on the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis. Following Elliott (1998 ), we show that if the exchange rate and relative price series contain near-to-unit roots in the context of a bivariate system, then any inference on the \"cointegrating\" vector and consequently on PPP, which is based on standard cointegration estimation methods, will be misleading. We then argue that the existing evidence against the PPP hypothesis in the British pound-US dollar market can be attributed to the finite sample bias of the standard cointegration estimators, arising from an endogenous and \"nearly\" nonstationary regressor. We also show that when robust procedures are employed the evidence favors the PPP hypothesis. Copyright © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009.","PeriodicalId":425229,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00809.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Empirical tests typically provide evidence that the British pound-US dollar exchange rate and the relative wholesale price index contain exact unit roots and exhibit cointegration. However, the cointegrating vector is significantly different from [1, - 1], thus raising doubts on the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis. Following Elliott (1998 ), we show that if the exchange rate and relative price series contain near-to-unit roots in the context of a bivariate system, then any inference on the "cointegrating" vector and consequently on PPP, which is based on standard cointegration estimation methods, will be misleading. We then argue that the existing evidence against the PPP hypothesis in the British pound-US dollar market can be attributed to the finite sample bias of the standard cointegration estimators, arising from an endogenous and "nearly" nonstationary regressor. We also show that when robust procedures are employed the evidence favors the PPP hypothesis. Copyright © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近单位根存在下的长期购买力平价:以英镑兑美元汇率为例
实证检验通常提供的证据表明,英镑-美元汇率和相对批发价格指数包含确切的单位根,并表现出协整。然而,协整向量与[1,- 1]显著不同,从而对购买力平价(PPP)假设的有效性提出质疑。根据Elliott(1998),我们表明,如果汇率和相对价格序列在二元系统的背景下包含近单位根,那么任何对“协整”向量的推断,以及由此产生的基于标准协整估计方法的购买力平价,都将具有误导性。然后,我们认为,现有的证据反对英镑-美元市场的购买力平价假设可以归因于标准协整估计量的有限样本偏差,这是由内生的和“近”非平稳回归量引起的。我们还表明,当采用稳健的程序时,证据有利于PPP假设。版权所有©2009作者。期刊汇编©Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Lagrange-Multiplier Test for Large Heterogeneous Panel Data Models "Go Wild for a While!": A New Asymptotically Normal Test for Forecast Evaluation in Nested Models Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability: Existence, Size, and Power Inference for Large-Scale Linear Systems with Known Coefficients The Testing of Efficient Market Hypotheses: A Study of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1