Survival Analysis and Torque Loosening of Experimental Screw After Mechanical Performance for Micro Conical Abutment

Rossana Reim Del´Gaudio Pignataro, Jefferson David Melo de-Matos, Ísis Luzcybel Ribeiro Pinto, Renata de Paulo Samico, M. Bottino, Nathália de Carvalho Ramos, Renata Marques de Melo Marinho
{"title":"Survival Analysis and Torque Loosening of Experimental Screw After Mechanical Performance for Micro Conical Abutment","authors":"Rossana Reim Del´Gaudio Pignataro, Jefferson David Melo de-Matos, Ísis Luzcybel Ribeiro Pinto, Renata de Paulo Samico, M. Bottino, Nathália de Carvalho Ramos, Renata Marques de Melo Marinho","doi":"10.4067/s0718-381x2022000100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most common failure in implantology are due to mechanical instability. Torque loosening or fracture of the screws are the most frequent complications. Furthermore, the fractured screw retrieval is complicated and time-consuming. So, modifications in the design of implant systems are justifiable to offer a greater degree of biomechanical stability. Thus, the present study proposes to evaluate an experimental geometry for abutment screw regarding failure probability and torque loss. Twenty implant/abutments sets (e-fix, A.S. Technology – Titanium Fix) were divided into the following groups (n=10 in each group): (1) Conventional screw (Screw neck ø 1.5 mm) and (2) Experimental screw (screw neck constricted ø 1.2 mm). The abutments were tightened with a controlled torque meter device following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Mechanical cycling was carried out with a load of 50 N.cm during 5 x 10 cycles with a frequency of 2 Hz at a temperature of 37 °C (ISO 14801). A digital torque meter was used to measure the reverse torque values of the prosthetic screw and the micro abutment screw, before and after loading. Data were statistically analyzed by One-way Anova and Tukey test (95 %). The results of the mean values of torque loss of the micro abutment screw were 58.44 % for the control group and 55.31 % for the experimental group and the mean torque loss for the prosthetic screw was 53.3 % and 61.3 % of the conventional and experimental groups, respectively. The survival probability was 100 % for both screw groups. It was concluded that experimental screw showed a similar behavior to conventional screws, showing similar reliability after fatigue life testing.","PeriodicalId":177464,"journal":{"name":"International journal of odontostomatology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of odontostomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-381x2022000100027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The most common failure in implantology are due to mechanical instability. Torque loosening or fracture of the screws are the most frequent complications. Furthermore, the fractured screw retrieval is complicated and time-consuming. So, modifications in the design of implant systems are justifiable to offer a greater degree of biomechanical stability. Thus, the present study proposes to evaluate an experimental geometry for abutment screw regarding failure probability and torque loss. Twenty implant/abutments sets (e-fix, A.S. Technology – Titanium Fix) were divided into the following groups (n=10 in each group): (1) Conventional screw (Screw neck ø 1.5 mm) and (2) Experimental screw (screw neck constricted ø 1.2 mm). The abutments were tightened with a controlled torque meter device following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Mechanical cycling was carried out with a load of 50 N.cm during 5 x 10 cycles with a frequency of 2 Hz at a temperature of 37 °C (ISO 14801). A digital torque meter was used to measure the reverse torque values of the prosthetic screw and the micro abutment screw, before and after loading. Data were statistically analyzed by One-way Anova and Tukey test (95 %). The results of the mean values of torque loss of the micro abutment screw were 58.44 % for the control group and 55.31 % for the experimental group and the mean torque loss for the prosthetic screw was 53.3 % and 61.3 % of the conventional and experimental groups, respectively. The survival probability was 100 % for both screw groups. It was concluded that experimental screw showed a similar behavior to conventional screws, showing similar reliability after fatigue life testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微锥基台力学性能后试验螺钉的生存分析及扭矩松动
在种植术中最常见的失败是由于机械不稳定。扭矩松动或螺钉断裂是最常见的并发症。此外,螺钉复位复杂且费时。因此,修改植入系统的设计是合理的,以提供更大程度的生物力学稳定性。因此,本研究提出了一种关于失效概率和扭矩损失的基台螺钉的实验几何形状。20组种植体/基台(e-fix, A.S. Technology - Titanium Fix)分为以下组(每组n=10):(1)常规螺钉(螺钉颈ø 1.5 mm)和(2)实验螺钉(螺钉颈缩窄ø 1.2 mm)。根据制造商的建议,用控制扭矩计装置拧紧基台。在温度为37°C (ISO 14801)的条件下,以50n .cm的载荷在5 x 10次循环中以2 Hz的频率进行机械循环。采用数字扭矩计测量假体螺钉和微基台螺钉在加载前后的反向扭矩值。资料采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(95%)进行统计学分析。结果:对照组微基牙螺钉的扭矩损失平均值为58.44%,试验组为55.31%,常规组和试验组的假体螺钉的扭矩损失平均值分别为53.3%和61.3%。两组患者的生存率均为100%。试验结果表明,试验螺杆与常规螺杆具有相似的性能,在疲劳寿命试验中表现出相似的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluación de las Lesiones Orofaciales y Traumatismos Dentales en Deportes de Combate y no Combate Índice de Dieta Mediterránea y pH Salival en Mujeres Adultas. Estudio Observacional Abordaje y Percepción de las y los Odontólogos Frente a Casos de Violencia Física contra la Mujer en Contexto Intrafamiliar/Compañero Íntimo en Chile Protocolo Abreviado Guiado Digital: Técnicas de Marcadores Tisulares, Silicona de Registro y CBCT con Sonrisa Cambios Hemodinámicos Asociados a Exodoncias de Terceros Molares Inferiores con el Uso de Articaína 4 % y/o Lidocaína 2 %: Una revisión sistemática
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1