Exercise Contractile Reserve for Predicting Mortality in Non-Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction

A. Bouzas-Mosquera, Fernando Rebollal, J. Broullón, J. Peteiro, J. Vazquez-Rodriguez, Marta Sagastagoitia, S. Rey
{"title":"Exercise Contractile Reserve for Predicting Mortality in Non-Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction","authors":"A. Bouzas-Mosquera, Fernando Rebollal, J. Broullón, J. Peteiro, J. Vazquez-Rodriguez, Marta Sagastagoitia, S. Rey","doi":"10.31487/j.rdi.2019.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: A preserved contractile reserve is a marker of favorable outcome in different cardiac diseases. In some studies, using drugs, an increase in left ventricular (LV) systolic function was associated to better prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We aimed to assess whether a positive contractile reserve (CR) to physical exercise is a marker of good outcome in patients with LV systolic dysfunction not related to coronary artery disease (CAD).\nDesign: From our exercise echocardiography database we extracted patients with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤45), negative coronary angiography, and absence of a history of CAD. A positive CR was considered when peak LVEF was higher that resting LVEF. The endpoint was overall mortality. \nResults and Conclusions: Among the 225 patients included, 105 had a positive CR and 120 a negative CR. Resting LV function was similar in patients with positive and negative CR (LVEF 35±8 vs. 34±9; wall motion score index 1.81±0.34 vs. 1.80±0.29; both p=NS). During a follow up of 6.2+4.7 years (25-75th percentiles 2.2-9.5), there were 71 deaths. Ten-year mortality rates were 34% for patients with CR and 67% for patients without CR (p=0.003). After multivariate adjustment that included clinical variables, medications, resting LV function, and exercise testing variables the only predictors of death were age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04-1.10, p<0.001), and absence of CR (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.98, p=0.02). In conclusion, in patients with non- ischemic LV dysfunction, a positive CR to physical exercise is a marker of better outcome.","PeriodicalId":308916,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rdi.2019.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A preserved contractile reserve is a marker of favorable outcome in different cardiac diseases. In some studies, using drugs, an increase in left ventricular (LV) systolic function was associated to better prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We aimed to assess whether a positive contractile reserve (CR) to physical exercise is a marker of good outcome in patients with LV systolic dysfunction not related to coronary artery disease (CAD). Design: From our exercise echocardiography database we extracted patients with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤45), negative coronary angiography, and absence of a history of CAD. A positive CR was considered when peak LVEF was higher that resting LVEF. The endpoint was overall mortality. Results and Conclusions: Among the 225 patients included, 105 had a positive CR and 120 a negative CR. Resting LV function was similar in patients with positive and negative CR (LVEF 35±8 vs. 34±9; wall motion score index 1.81±0.34 vs. 1.80±0.29; both p=NS). During a follow up of 6.2+4.7 years (25-75th percentiles 2.2-9.5), there were 71 deaths. Ten-year mortality rates were 34% for patients with CR and 67% for patients without CR (p=0.003). After multivariate adjustment that included clinical variables, medications, resting LV function, and exercise testing variables the only predictors of death were age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04-1.10, p<0.001), and absence of CR (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.98, p=0.02). In conclusion, in patients with non- ischemic LV dysfunction, a positive CR to physical exercise is a marker of better outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动收缩储备预测非缺血性心室功能障碍的死亡率
目的:保留收缩储备是不同心脏疾病预后良好的标志。在一些研究中,使用药物,左心室收缩功能的增加与扩张型心肌病患者更好的预后相关。我们的目的是评估体育锻炼的阳性收缩储备(CR)是否是与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)无关的左室收缩功能障碍患者预后良好的标志。设计:从我们的运动超声心动图数据库中提取左室收缩功能障碍(LVEF≤45)、冠状动脉造影阴性、无CAD病史的患者。当LVEF峰值高于静息时,认为CR为阳性。终点是总死亡率。结果与结论:纳入的225例患者中,CR阳性105例,CR阴性120例,CR阳性和阴性患者的静息左室功能相似(LVEF 35±8∶34±9;壁面运动评分指数(1.81±0.34)vs(1.80±0.29);两个p = NS)。在6.2+4.7年(25-75百分位数2.2-9.5)的随访期间,有71例死亡。有CR患者的10年死亡率为34%,无CR患者为67% (p=0.003)。在包括临床变量、药物、静息左室功能和运动测试变量在内的多因素调整后,死亡的唯一预测因素是年龄(风险比(HR) 1.07, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.04-1.10, p<0.001)和无CR (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.98, p=0.02)。总之,在非缺血性左室功能障碍患者中,运动CR阳性是预后较好的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size Specific Dose Estimate in Abdominal Computed Tomography by AAPM TG Report-204 and AAPM TG Report-220 A Potential Solution to Assess the Absorbed Dose at Any Point in Breast During Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Imaging Using a Novel Monte Carlo Simulation Software Quantitative Assessment of Iodine Intensity of Different Types of Lesions in the Low-Energy (LE) Images of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Radiological Correlation of Negative Appendectomies: A Clinical Audit A Short Review of Benefits of Using Chest CT Characteristics for Early diagnoses to Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1