Dimensión vertical oclusal: comparación de 2 métodos cefalométricos

Rodrigo Quiroga-del Pozo , Marcial Sierra-Fuentes , Julieta del Pozo-Bassi , Rodrigo Quiroga-Aravena
{"title":"Dimensión vertical oclusal: comparación de 2 métodos cefalométricos","authors":"Rodrigo Quiroga-del Pozo ,&nbsp;Marcial Sierra-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Julieta del Pozo-Bassi ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Quiroga-Aravena","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2016.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) determined with the “Knebelman Craniometric method” and with the “Willis method” on the same patient.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>The study was conducted on a sample of 74 subjects with their full dentition. The mean age was, They were students of fourth year, with a mean age of 22 years<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.99, from the Faculty of Dentistry at Mayor University. The measurement instruments used were the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device. They were used according to the methodology recommended by their manufacturers. The results were analysed using the Paired T-test, with the OVD determined by each method expressed in millimetres.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences were found when comparing the OVD determined using the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device on the same patient (mean difference of 0.7<!--> <!-->mm between both methods).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There were no significant statistical or clinical differences between both studied instruments. In this context complementing with both instruments, the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device, could be a valuable tool to fine-tune and simplify the measurement of OVD in edentulous patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 264-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2016.09.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539116300441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) determined with the “Knebelman Craniometric method” and with the “Willis method” on the same patient.

Material and method

The study was conducted on a sample of 74 subjects with their full dentition. The mean age was, They were students of fourth year, with a mean age of 22 years ± 0.99, from the Faculty of Dentistry at Mayor University. The measurement instruments used were the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device. They were used according to the methodology recommended by their manufacturers. The results were analysed using the Paired T-test, with the OVD determined by each method expressed in millimetres.

Results

No significant differences were found when comparing the OVD determined using the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device on the same patient (mean difference of 0.7 mm between both methods).

Conclusion

There were no significant statistical or clinical differences between both studied instruments. In this context complementing with both instruments, the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device, could be a valuable tool to fine-tune and simplify the measurement of OVD in edentulous patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咬合垂直尺寸:两种头影测量方法的比较
目的比较“Knebelman颅骨测量法”与“Willis法”测定的同一患者的咬合垂直尺寸(OVD)。材料与方法本研究以74名具有完整牙列的受试者为样本。平均年龄为:来自马约尔大学牙科学院的四年级学生,平均年龄22岁±0.99岁。测量仪器为Knebelman颅骨仪和Willis Device。它们是根据制造商推荐的方法使用的。使用配对t检验对结果进行分析,每种方法确定的OVD以毫米表示。结果在同一患者上,Knebelman颅压仪与Willis Device测定的OVD无显著差异(两种方法平均相差0.7 mm)。结论两种仪器在临床及统计学上均无显著差异。在这种情况下,Knebelman颅压计和Willis装置作为这两种仪器的补充,可以成为微调和简化无牙患者OVD测量的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flujo salival y caries radicular en adultos mayores autovalentes Necesidad de tratamiento periodontal en adolescentes de 12 años de colegios municipalizados en Valdivia–Chile 2014: estudio transversal Impacto de la hipomineralización incisivo molar en la experiencia de caries en escolares de 6-12 años en Santiago, Chile Repigmentación melánica de la melanosis gingival. Revisión sistemática Marsupialización modificada de ránula gigante intraoral: reporte de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1