Kubernetes for Cloud Container Orchestration Versus Containers as a Service (CaaS): Practical Insights

Senecca Miller, Travis Siems, V. Debroy
{"title":"Kubernetes for Cloud Container Orchestration Versus Containers as a Service (CaaS): Practical Insights","authors":"Senecca Miller, Travis Siems, V. Debroy","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW53611.2021.00110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Containers have become the de facto standard for packaging software today, especially in the cloud. However, manually managing the runtime of containers (i.e., container orchestration) can be very complicated, which is why tooling such as Kubernetes, which allows for managed or semi-managed orchestration, has grown in popularity. It is possible to delegate container management altogether, by opting for Container as a Service (CaaS) offerings. There are important tradeoffs involved in these choices, and while much has been said about how to containerize and adopt a particular container orchestration approach, relatively less has been said about how to decide on which approach might work best. This article outlines why we chose the CaaS approach over Kubernetes at Dottid, and transparently discusses the factors we took into consideration. In doing so, we contribute to the technical corpus, and aim to stimulate further industrial-academic research and collaboration, in this emergent area of study.","PeriodicalId":385392,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW53611.2021.00110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Containers have become the de facto standard for packaging software today, especially in the cloud. However, manually managing the runtime of containers (i.e., container orchestration) can be very complicated, which is why tooling such as Kubernetes, which allows for managed or semi-managed orchestration, has grown in popularity. It is possible to delegate container management altogether, by opting for Container as a Service (CaaS) offerings. There are important tradeoffs involved in these choices, and while much has been said about how to containerize and adopt a particular container orchestration approach, relatively less has been said about how to decide on which approach might work best. This article outlines why we chose the CaaS approach over Kubernetes at Dottid, and transparently discusses the factors we took into consideration. In doing so, we contribute to the technical corpus, and aim to stimulate further industrial-academic research and collaboration, in this emergent area of study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kubernetes用于云容器编排与容器即服务(CaaS):实践见解
容器已经成为当今包装软件的事实上的标准,尤其是在云环境中。然而,手动管理容器的运行时(即容器编排)可能非常复杂,这就是为什么Kubernetes等工具(它允许托管或半托管编排)越来越受欢迎的原因。通过选择容器即服务(CaaS)产品,可以完全委托容器管理。在这些选择中涉及到重要的权衡,虽然关于如何容器化和采用特定的容器编排方法已经讨论了很多,但是关于如何决定哪种方法可能最有效的讨论相对较少。本文概述了我们在Dottid选择CaaS方法而不是Kubernetes的原因,并透明地讨论了我们考虑的因素。在此过程中,我们为技术语料库做出了贡献,并旨在促进这一新兴研究领域的进一步工业-学术研究和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An efficient dual ensemble software defect prediction method with neural network Genetic Algorithm-based Testing of Industrial Elevators under Passenger Uncertainty Predicting gray fault based on context graph in container-based cloud Aging and Rejuvenation Models of Load Changing Attacks in Micro-Grids Sensitivity Analysis of Software Rejuvenation Model with Markov Regenerative Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1