Comparative in vitro and in vivo activity of fleroxacin and ofloxacin against various mycobacteria

H. Tomioka, K. Sato, H. Saito
{"title":"Comparative in vitro and in vivo activity of fleroxacin and ofloxacin against various mycobacteria","authors":"H. Tomioka,&nbsp;K. Sato,&nbsp;H. Saito","doi":"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90003-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>In vitro</em> antimicrobial activity of fleroxacin (6,8- difluoro-1-(2-fluoroethyl)-1, 4-dihydro-7- (4-methyl-1 -piperazinyl) -4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid) and ofloxacin against representative pathogenic mycobacteria was evaluated by the agar dilution method, using 7H11 agar medium. Fleroxacin showed appreciable antimicrobial activity against <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> (MIC<sub>90</sub>=6.25 mg/l), <em>M. kansasii</em> (MIC<sub>90</sub>=3.13 mg/l), and <em>M. fortuitum</em> (MIC<sub>90</sub>=6.25 mg/l), whereas <em>M. marinum, M. scrofulaceum, M. avium, M. intracellulare</em>, and <em>M. chelonae</em> were highly resistant to the agent. The activity of fleroxacin was comparable to that of ofloxacin. Fleroxacin showed antimicrobial activity against <em>M. intracellulare</em> phagocytosed in murine peritoneal macrophages at a concentration of 10 mg/l in the culture medium, but its activity was considerably lower than that of ofloxacin. On the other hand, the therapeutic activity of fleroxacin against <em>M. fortuitum</em> infection induced in mice was higher than that of ofloxacin. Neither fleroxacin nor ofloxacin was efficacious against <em>M. intracellulare</em> infection. Fleroxacin significantly depressed the growth of <em>M. leprae</em> in the mouse footpad.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23472,"journal":{"name":"Tubercle","volume":"72 3","pages":"Pages 176-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90003-B","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tubercle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190003B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

In vitro antimicrobial activity of fleroxacin (6,8- difluoro-1-(2-fluoroethyl)-1, 4-dihydro-7- (4-methyl-1 -piperazinyl) -4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid) and ofloxacin against representative pathogenic mycobacteria was evaluated by the agar dilution method, using 7H11 agar medium. Fleroxacin showed appreciable antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MIC90=6.25 mg/l), M. kansasii (MIC90=3.13 mg/l), and M. fortuitum (MIC90=6.25 mg/l), whereas M. marinum, M. scrofulaceum, M. avium, M. intracellulare, and M. chelonae were highly resistant to the agent. The activity of fleroxacin was comparable to that of ofloxacin. Fleroxacin showed antimicrobial activity against M. intracellulare phagocytosed in murine peritoneal macrophages at a concentration of 10 mg/l in the culture medium, but its activity was considerably lower than that of ofloxacin. On the other hand, the therapeutic activity of fleroxacin against M. fortuitum infection induced in mice was higher than that of ofloxacin. Neither fleroxacin nor ofloxacin was efficacious against M. intracellulare infection. Fleroxacin significantly depressed the growth of M. leprae in the mouse footpad.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较氟罗沙星和氧氟沙星对多种分枝杆菌的体内外活性
采用琼脂稀释法,采用7H11琼脂培养基,测定氟沙星(6,8-二氟-1-(2-氟乙基)- 1,4 -二氢-7-(4-甲基-1-哌嗪基)- 4-氧-3-喹啉羧酸)和氧氟沙星对代表性致病性分枝杆菌的体外抑菌活性。氟罗沙星对结核分枝杆菌(MIC90=6.25 mg/l)、kansasii分枝杆菌(MIC90=3.13 mg/l)和fortuitum分枝杆菌(MIC90=6.25 mg/l)的抑菌活性较好,而对海洋分枝杆菌、scrofulaceum分枝杆菌、avium分枝杆菌、胞内分枝杆菌和chelonae分枝杆菌的抑菌活性较高。氟罗沙星与氧氟沙星的活性相当。氟罗沙星对小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞中被吞噬的胞内支原体有抑菌活性,浓度为10 mg/l时,其抑菌活性明显低于氧氟沙星。另一方面,氟罗沙星对小鼠诱导的福尔图姆菌感染的治疗活性高于氧氟沙星。氟罗沙星和氧氟沙星对胞内感染均无效。氟罗沙星能显著抑制小鼠足垫麻风分枝杆菌的生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Volume contents Mobilising the appropriate T-cell subset: the immune response as taxonomist? Severe skin reactions to thiacetazone in East Nepal Koch's phenomenon: can it be corrected?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1