A Grounded Theory Study about the Body from Relational Sociologic Perspective

A. Kasapoglu
{"title":"A Grounded Theory Study about the Body from Relational Sociologic Perspective","authors":"A. Kasapoglu","doi":"10.29011/2690-9480.100139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, it is aimed to overcome the sociological studies carried out in harmony with the bio-medical model, which is now abandoned in medicine. It is aimed to answer three questions as sub-problems for the main problem of the inadequacy of studies on the body, which is mostly based on naturalistic positivistic sociological quantitative research: a) Can “relational sociology” be the theoretical basis for a more adequate body sociology? b) To what extent is a grounded theory methodology suitable for data collection and analysis in relational sociological work? c) What kind of differences and contributions can be made in body and health sociology studies by applying relational sociology and grounded theory methodology together? In the research, coding was done in accordance with the grounded theory method. Delphi technique was also used in the study. The main feature of the research is the simultaneous data collection and analysis. It has been understood that two similar concepts as “cüsse”(size) and “kalıp” (form) in the dominant traditional Anatolian folk culture in Turkey are used instead of body. Contrary to classical sociology based on duality and essentialism, it has been revealed that the word “şişman” (fat), as a more ambiguous concept, is used instead of obese because of its liminal feature, which includes both health and disease. It has been understood that the word “şişmanlık “(fatness) in Turkish is preferred for obesity. As a result, it has been shown that two words from Anatolian folk culture are used in a reframed way instead of obese and obesity, which are the disease signs of modern medicine. In addition, the distinction between “balık etli” (fish/ full figured) for women and “tosun” (bullock) for men is another interesting and important finding of the study. Reports on Global Health Research Kasapoglu A. Rep Glob Health Res 4: 139. https://www.doi.org/10.29011/2690-9480.100139 www.gavinpublishers.com","PeriodicalId":281954,"journal":{"name":"Reports on Global Health Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports on Global Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2690-9480.100139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, it is aimed to overcome the sociological studies carried out in harmony with the bio-medical model, which is now abandoned in medicine. It is aimed to answer three questions as sub-problems for the main problem of the inadequacy of studies on the body, which is mostly based on naturalistic positivistic sociological quantitative research: a) Can “relational sociology” be the theoretical basis for a more adequate body sociology? b) To what extent is a grounded theory methodology suitable for data collection and analysis in relational sociological work? c) What kind of differences and contributions can be made in body and health sociology studies by applying relational sociology and grounded theory methodology together? In the research, coding was done in accordance with the grounded theory method. Delphi technique was also used in the study. The main feature of the research is the simultaneous data collection and analysis. It has been understood that two similar concepts as “cüsse”(size) and “kalıp” (form) in the dominant traditional Anatolian folk culture in Turkey are used instead of body. Contrary to classical sociology based on duality and essentialism, it has been revealed that the word “şişman” (fat), as a more ambiguous concept, is used instead of obese because of its liminal feature, which includes both health and disease. It has been understood that the word “şişmanlık “(fatness) in Turkish is preferred for obesity. As a result, it has been shown that two words from Anatolian folk culture are used in a reframed way instead of obese and obesity, which are the disease signs of modern medicine. In addition, the distinction between “balık etli” (fish/ full figured) for women and “tosun” (bullock) for men is another interesting and important finding of the study. Reports on Global Health Research Kasapoglu A. Rep Glob Health Res 4: 139. https://www.doi.org/10.29011/2690-9480.100139 www.gavinpublishers.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系社会学视角下关于身体的扎根理论研究
在这篇文章中,旨在克服与生物医学模式相协调的社会学研究,这种模式现在在医学上被抛弃了。本文旨在回答以自然主义实证主义社会学定量研究为主的身体研究不足这一主要问题的三个子问题:a)“关系社会学”能否成为更充分的身体社会学的理论基础?b)扎根理论方法论在多大程度上适合于关系社会学工作中的数据收集和分析?c)关系社会学与扎根理论方法论相结合,可以在身体与健康社会学研究中产生怎样的差异和贡献?在研究中,采用扎根理论方法进行编码。采用德尔菲法进行研究。本研究的主要特点是数据收集和分析同时进行。据了解,在土耳其占主导地位的传统安纳托利亚民间文化中,使用了“c sse”(尺寸)和“kalıp”(形式)两个类似的概念来代替身体。与基于二元论和本质论的经典社会学相反,人们发现使用“ 人”(肥胖)一词来代替肥胖,这是一个更模糊的概念,因为它具有阈值特征,既包括健康,也包括疾病。据了解,土耳其语中的“şişmanlık”(肥胖)一词更适合表示肥胖。结果表明,这两个来自安纳托利亚民间文化的词被重新使用,而不是现代医学的疾病标志“肥胖”和“肥胖”。此外,女性的“balık etli”(鱼/丰满)和男性的“tosun”(公牛)之间的区别是该研究的另一个有趣而重要的发现。全球卫生研究报告[j] .世界卫生杂志(4):139。https://www.doi.org/10.29011/2690 - 9480.100139 www.gavinpublishers.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Exploration of Panic and Cold Facial Immersion Health System in Nepal in Context of WHO Building Blocks Sustainability of Biodiversity: Use of a NetWeaver Tool to Identify Suitable Sites for Reintroduction of Fishes “Maternity is us”: Strengthening Teamwork and Communication in Maternity Wards in Sierra Leone Helping Babies Breathe-A Comparative Analysis of Virtual and Traditional Mentored Train-the-Trainer Courses: A Pilot Program for Physician Assistants in Liberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1