Goal-oriented compliance with multiple regulations

S. Ghanavati, André Rifaut, E. Dubois, Daniel Amyot
{"title":"Goal-oriented compliance with multiple regulations","authors":"S. Ghanavati, André Rifaut, E. Dubois, Daniel Amyot","doi":"10.1109/RE.2014.6912249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most systems and business processes in organizations need to comply with more than one law or regulation. Different regulations can partially overlap (e.g., one can be more detailed than the other) or even conflict with each other. In addition, one regulation can permit an action whereas the same action in another regulation might be mandatory or forbidden. In each of these cases, an organization needs to take different strategies. This paper presents an approach to handle different situations when comparing and attempting to comply with multiple regulations as part of a goal-oriented modeling framework named LEGAL-URN. This framework helps organizations find suitable trade-offs and priorities when complying with multiple regulations while at the same time trying to meet their own business objectives. The approach is illustrated with a case study involving a Canadian health care organization that must comply with four laws related to privacy, quality of care, freedom of information, and care consent.","PeriodicalId":307764,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2014.6912249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Most systems and business processes in organizations need to comply with more than one law or regulation. Different regulations can partially overlap (e.g., one can be more detailed than the other) or even conflict with each other. In addition, one regulation can permit an action whereas the same action in another regulation might be mandatory or forbidden. In each of these cases, an organization needs to take different strategies. This paper presents an approach to handle different situations when comparing and attempting to comply with multiple regulations as part of a goal-oriented modeling framework named LEGAL-URN. This framework helps organizations find suitable trade-offs and priorities when complying with multiple regulations while at the same time trying to meet their own business objectives. The approach is illustrated with a case study involving a Canadian health care organization that must comply with four laws related to privacy, quality of care, freedom of information, and care consent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以目标为导向,遵守多个法规
组织中的大多数系统和业务流程需要遵守不止一条法律或法规。不同的法规可能部分重叠(例如,一个可能比另一个更详细),甚至相互冲突。此外,一项法规可能允许某一行为,而同一行为在另一项法规中可能是强制性的或被禁止的。在每种情况下,组织都需要采取不同的策略。本文提出了一种方法,在比较和试图遵守多个规则时处理不同的情况,作为一个名为LEGAL-URN的面向目标的建模框架的一部分。此框架可帮助组织在遵守多个法规的同时尝试满足自己的业务目标时找到合适的权衡和优先级。通过一个涉及加拿大卫生保健组织的案例研究说明了这种方法,该组织必须遵守与隐私、护理质量、信息自由和护理同意有关的四项法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated detection and resolution of legal cross references: Approach and a study of Luxembourg's legislation Towards a situation awareness design to improve visually impaired orientation in unfamiliar buildings: Requirements elicitation study Capturing and sharing domain knowledge with business rules lessons learned from a global software vendor Automated support for combinational creativity in requirements engineering Non-functional requirements as qualities, with a spice of ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1