Team-Based Text Analytics for Health Information Systems Learning

Tim Arnold, Helen J. A. Fuller, Serge Yee, Seema Nazeer, R. Reeves
{"title":"Team-Based Text Analytics for Health Information Systems Learning","authors":"Tim Arnold, Helen J. A. Fuller, Serge Yee, Seema Nazeer, R. Reeves","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In healthcare operations, narrative text and comments from questionnaires are common and abundant. Making sense of and coming to some shared meanings around text comments from such questionnaires is often time consuming. A lack of resources and expertise may contribute to hesitation and indecisions when deciding on how or if to analyze text. Because of challenges with analyzing text in operational settings, there can be reluctance to capture rich narrative information. Nonetheless, narrative comments can be a source of rich information that with reliable and faster approaches for analyzing may help with informing operational decisions and human-centered design efforts. In this paper, we describe using text analytics approaches for contributing to thematic analysis of users’ comments to help with health information systems learning.Several text analytic approaches were explored as possible pathways to reduce the burden of reviewing comments about training around health information systems. Approaches included topic modelling, keyword extraction and creating word clouds, word co-occurrence and uniquely co-occurring word visualizations, and text classifiers and nomograms that highlights top linguistic features for the trained classifier. The team walked through example approaches and visualizations and decided on next steps.Visualizations of word co-occurrence and uniquely co-occurring word networks and top linguistic features used to train a naïve-bayes text classifier were used to envision possible categories or codes. Regular expressions were iteratively formulated consisting of some combination of words and stems as codes were formulated and extracts were repeatedly reviewed. Code formulation corresponded with refinement of regular expressions. Individual comments could be multi-labeled and not all comments were coded. Static visuals, text examples, regular expressions, and extract quantities were collected, presented, discussed, and refined with the review team.The purpose of this work was to explore text analytic approaches to assist with response interpretation and to apply filtering techniques for addressing concerns of information overload. Addressing concerns about information overload may reduce hesitation with collecting and examining text. By reframing this as a filtering problem, we began to inquire into ways to review, create codes, and code comments more quickly. Including and fine-tuning text analytics approaches may help teams learn more quickly from questionnaire comments about how users perceive working within health information systems. Finally, lowering thresholds for analyzing text may boost motivations for gathering rich information keeping us from missing out on vital viewpoints and language use across time.","PeriodicalId":389399,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In healthcare operations, narrative text and comments from questionnaires are common and abundant. Making sense of and coming to some shared meanings around text comments from such questionnaires is often time consuming. A lack of resources and expertise may contribute to hesitation and indecisions when deciding on how or if to analyze text. Because of challenges with analyzing text in operational settings, there can be reluctance to capture rich narrative information. Nonetheless, narrative comments can be a source of rich information that with reliable and faster approaches for analyzing may help with informing operational decisions and human-centered design efforts. In this paper, we describe using text analytics approaches for contributing to thematic analysis of users’ comments to help with health information systems learning.Several text analytic approaches were explored as possible pathways to reduce the burden of reviewing comments about training around health information systems. Approaches included topic modelling, keyword extraction and creating word clouds, word co-occurrence and uniquely co-occurring word visualizations, and text classifiers and nomograms that highlights top linguistic features for the trained classifier. The team walked through example approaches and visualizations and decided on next steps.Visualizations of word co-occurrence and uniquely co-occurring word networks and top linguistic features used to train a naïve-bayes text classifier were used to envision possible categories or codes. Regular expressions were iteratively formulated consisting of some combination of words and stems as codes were formulated and extracts were repeatedly reviewed. Code formulation corresponded with refinement of regular expressions. Individual comments could be multi-labeled and not all comments were coded. Static visuals, text examples, regular expressions, and extract quantities were collected, presented, discussed, and refined with the review team.The purpose of this work was to explore text analytic approaches to assist with response interpretation and to apply filtering techniques for addressing concerns of information overload. Addressing concerns about information overload may reduce hesitation with collecting and examining text. By reframing this as a filtering problem, we began to inquire into ways to review, create codes, and code comments more quickly. Including and fine-tuning text analytics approaches may help teams learn more quickly from questionnaire comments about how users perceive working within health information systems. Finally, lowering thresholds for analyzing text may boost motivations for gathering rich information keeping us from missing out on vital viewpoints and language use across time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于团队的文本分析健康信息系统学习
在医疗保健业务中,调查问卷的叙述性文本和评论是常见和丰富的。从这样的调查问卷中找出文本评论的意义并得出一些共同的意义通常是很耗时的。在决定如何或是否分析文本时,缺乏资源和专业知识可能会导致犹豫和犹豫不决。由于在操作设置中分析文本存在挑战,因此可能不愿意捕捉丰富的叙事信息。尽管如此,叙述性评论可以成为丰富信息的来源,通过可靠和快速的分析方法可以帮助告知操作决策和以人为本的设计工作。在本文中,我们描述了使用文本分析方法对用户评论进行专题分析,以帮助健康信息系统学习。探讨了几种文本分析方法,作为减轻审查卫生信息系统培训评论负担的可能途径。方法包括主题建模,关键字提取和创建词云,词共现和唯一共现的词可视化,以及文本分类器和法图,为训练的分类器突出显示顶级语言特征。团队通过示例方法和可视化来决定下一步。用于训练naïve-bayes文本分类器的词共现和唯一共现词网络的可视化和顶级语言特征被用来设想可能的类别或代码。正则表达式是由一些词和词干的组合组成的,随着代码的制定和摘录的反复审查而迭代地制定。代码的表述与正则表达式的细化相对应。单个注释可以是多标签的,并且不是所有的注释都是编码的。静态视觉效果、文本示例、正则表达式和提取量被收集、呈现、讨论,并与评审团队一起进行了改进。这项工作的目的是探索文本分析方法,以协助响应解释,并应用过滤技术来解决信息过载的问题。解决对信息过载的担忧可能会减少收集和检查文本时的犹豫。通过将其重新定义为一个过滤问题,我们开始探索更快地审查、创建代码和代码注释的方法。包括和微调文本分析方法可以帮助团队更快地从问卷评论中了解用户对卫生信息系统工作的看法。最后,降低分析文本的门槛可能会提高收集丰富信息的动机,使我们不会错过重要的观点和语言的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying User Interface Profiles to Ensure Safe Remote Control within the Open Networked Operating Room in accordance with ISO IEEE 11073 SDC AR-Coach: Using Augmented Reality (AR) for Real-Time Clinical Guidance During Medical Emergencies on Deep Space Exploration Missions Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: The Explainability Ethical Paradox Hypothesis on the supreme value criteria of the global civilization Preliminary wear trial of anisotropic textile brace designed for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1