Cross-Border Tax Problems of EU and Third Countries

Natalija Zunic
{"title":"Cross-Border Tax Problems of EU and Third Countries","authors":"Natalija Zunic","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2237424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cross-border operation of individuals and business brings about the problems of double taxation. Long time ago countries resorted to conclusion of bilateral treaties in the attempt to eliminate these obstacles to movement and trade. Besides unilateral measures, double taxation treaties are an important instrument in today's taxation policy of many countries. In the same time double taxation treaties are also identified as tax obstacles, especially in the area of company taxation in the single market. The EU must consider possible conflicts between the EC Treaty and the bilateral double taxation treaties that Member States have concluded with each other and with third countries. It is a part of EU general strategy and policy of addressing the crossborder tax problems. Described situation requires urgent solution and it is possible to find several proposals in this field. Although this proposals can be divided in two main groups – namely, positive and negative integration it is clear that mentioned conflict(s) can not be resolved through negative integration (of direct taxes within the EU by ECJ). But, the double taxation agreements of Member States will continue to be subject to review by the ECJ and there are certain rulings in this area that must be pointed out. The second group of solution is positive integration is consisted of several (possible) activities. Not third, but more intermediate solution is also suggested. Since Amsterdam Treaty introduced and Nice Treaty developed further the possibilities for closer cooperation between sub-groups of “compatible” member states it is suggested “closer cooperation” because it might provide a moving forward in the area of direct taxation and cross-border tax problems.","PeriodicalId":121229,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: National eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: National eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cross-border operation of individuals and business brings about the problems of double taxation. Long time ago countries resorted to conclusion of bilateral treaties in the attempt to eliminate these obstacles to movement and trade. Besides unilateral measures, double taxation treaties are an important instrument in today's taxation policy of many countries. In the same time double taxation treaties are also identified as tax obstacles, especially in the area of company taxation in the single market. The EU must consider possible conflicts between the EC Treaty and the bilateral double taxation treaties that Member States have concluded with each other and with third countries. It is a part of EU general strategy and policy of addressing the crossborder tax problems. Described situation requires urgent solution and it is possible to find several proposals in this field. Although this proposals can be divided in two main groups – namely, positive and negative integration it is clear that mentioned conflict(s) can not be resolved through negative integration (of direct taxes within the EU by ECJ). But, the double taxation agreements of Member States will continue to be subject to review by the ECJ and there are certain rulings in this area that must be pointed out. The second group of solution is positive integration is consisted of several (possible) activities. Not third, but more intermediate solution is also suggested. Since Amsterdam Treaty introduced and Nice Treaty developed further the possibilities for closer cooperation between sub-groups of “compatible” member states it is suggested “closer cooperation” because it might provide a moving forward in the area of direct taxation and cross-border tax problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟与第三国的跨境税收问题
个人与企业的跨境经营带来了双重征税的问题。很久以前,各国采取缔结双边条约的办法,试图消除这些流动和贸易障碍。除单边措施外,避免双重征税协定是当今许多国家税收政策的重要工具。与此同时,双重征税条约也被确定为税收障碍,特别是在单一市场的公司征税领域。欧盟必须考虑欧共体条约与成员国之间和与第三国缔结的双边双重征税条约之间可能存在的冲突。它是欧盟解决跨境税收问题的总体战略和政策的一部分。上述情况需要紧急解决,有可能在这一领域找到若干建议。虽然这些建议可以分为两大类,即积极整合和消极整合,但很明显,上述冲突不能通过消极整合(欧洲法院在欧盟内部的直接税)来解决。但是,成员国的双重征税协定将继续受到欧洲法院的审查,必须指出这方面的某些裁决。第二组解决方案是正集成,由几个(可能的)活动组成。不是第三种,而是更中间的解决方案。由于《阿姆斯特丹条约》的提出和《尼斯条约》进一步发展了“兼容”成员国分组之间更密切合作的可能性,因此建议进行“更密切合作”,因为这可能在直接税和跨境税收问题领域取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Metering Interoperability Issues and Solutions: Taking Inspiration from Other Ecosystems and Sectors COVID-19 Vaccination and Data Protection Issues: A European Comparative Study With Focuses on France, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland Costituzionalismo e diversità etnica: il caso della Bosnia-Erzegovina (Constitutionalism and Ethnic Diversity: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina) Judicial Assistants in Europe – A Comparative Analysis Connected Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1