Online Hate Ratings Vary by Extremes: A Statistical Analysis

Joni O. Salminen, Hind Almerekhi, A. Kamel, Soon-Gyo Jung, B. Jansen
{"title":"Online Hate Ratings Vary by Extremes: A Statistical Analysis","authors":"Joni O. Salminen, Hind Almerekhi, A. Kamel, Soon-Gyo Jung, B. Jansen","doi":"10.1145/3295750.3298954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing 5,665 crowd ratings on 1,133 social media comments, we find that individuals tend to agree on the extremes of a hate rating scale more than in the middle when evaluating the hatefulness of online comments. The agreement is higher for less hateful comments and lowest on moderately hateful comments. The results have implications for researchers developing machine learning models for online hate processing, as the extreme classes are likely to require fewer annotations for reaching statistical stability. Our findings suggest that the models developed in this domain should consider the distributions of hate ratings rather than average hate scores.","PeriodicalId":187771,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Analyzing 5,665 crowd ratings on 1,133 social media comments, we find that individuals tend to agree on the extremes of a hate rating scale more than in the middle when evaluating the hatefulness of online comments. The agreement is higher for less hateful comments and lowest on moderately hateful comments. The results have implications for researchers developing machine learning models for online hate processing, as the extreme classes are likely to require fewer annotations for reaching statistical stability. Our findings suggest that the models developed in this domain should consider the distributions of hate ratings rather than average hate scores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络仇恨评级因极端而异:一项统计分析
通过对1,133条社交媒体评论的5,665个人群评分进行分析,我们发现,在评估网络评论的可恨性时,个人倾向于同意仇恨评级量表的极端,而不是中间。不那么可恶的评论的一致性更高,而适度可恶的评论的一致性最低。研究结果对开发用于在线仇恨处理的机器学习模型的研究人员具有启示意义,因为极端类可能需要更少的注释来达到统计稳定性。我们的研究结果表明,在这个领域开发的模型应该考虑仇恨评级的分布,而不是平均仇恨得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assisting Health Consumers While Searching the Web through Medical Annotations Do Metrics Matter? Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities NotifyMeHere: Intelligent Notification Delivery in Multi-Device Environments Computational Surprise, Perceptual Surprise, and Personal Background in Text Understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1