{"title":"Agricultural development, structural transformation, and East Asian trade","authors":"K. Anderson","doi":"10.4337/9781788975162.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trends in regional trade in agricultural products are reviewed. The chapter includes discussion of the theory of the modern drivers of the evolution of agricultural comparative advantage as economies grow. It asks: to what extent are the actual trade patterns in East Asia consistent with that theory? The actual trade patterns are somewhat inconsistent with the theory, which is because trade-related policies have restricted agricultural trade of East Asian economies in various ways. In particular, several countries have restricted their exports of key farm products while their incomes were low, which implies the imposition of a tax on agriculture. Other countries have gradually raised barriers to agricultural imports as the international competitiveness of their farmers declined in the course of economic growth and industrialisation. A ‘tradition’ of gradually moving away from taxing and toward protecting farmers relative to producers in non-farm sectors is identified. But this process should not be taken as given. Some richer countries are reducing their agricultural protection, following the agricultural reforms of West European countries. Also there are new and cheaper means of achieving the policy objectives of agricultural policies, even in the region’s poorer countries, which allow countries to move away from less-efficient price- and trade-distorting policy instruments to more efficient ones for redistributing the benefits of economic growth and integration. While switching to these new measures is not a trivial task, doing so would help integrate regional trade in these products and provide better options for responding to supply shocks such as the COVID-19 epidemic and local events associated with climate change. © The Editors and Contributors Severally 2021.","PeriodicalId":260801,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on East Asian Economic Integration","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on East Asian Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975162.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
农业发展、结构转型与东亚贸易
回顾了区域农产品贸易的趋势。本章讨论了农业比较优势随着经济增长而演变的现代驱动力理论。它提出的问题是:东亚的实际贸易模式在多大程度上符合这一理论?实际的贸易模式与理论有些不一致,这是因为与贸易有关的政策以各种方式限制了东亚经济体的农业贸易。特别是,一些国家在收入较低的情况下限制了主要农产品的出口,这意味着对农业征税。其他国家在经济增长和工业化的过程中,由于农民的国际竞争力下降,逐渐提高了农产品进口壁垒。报告指出,相对于非农业部门的生产者,逐渐从征税转向保护农民的“传统”。但这一过程不应被视为理所当然。随着西欧国家的农业改革,一些富裕国家正在减少对农业的保护。此外,即使在本区域较贫穷的国家,也有新的和较便宜的手段来实现农业政策的政策目标,这些手段使各国能够从效率较低的价格和扭曲贸易的政策工具转向效率较高的政策工具,以重新分配经济增长和一体化的利益。虽然采用这些新措施并非易事,但这样做将有助于整合这些产品的区域贸易,并为应对COVID-19疫情和与气候变化相关的地方事件等供应冲击提供更好的选择。©编辑和贡献者各自2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。