Local Solution for a Global Problem

Andrew Shifren
{"title":"Local Solution for a Global Problem","authors":"Andrew Shifren","doi":"10.52214/cjel.v47i1.9130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nNitrogen pollution is one of the most pressing environmental problems in the U.S. today, with grave implications for human and environmental health. Agricultural activities release the most nitrogen pollution of any industry, but a combination of prescriptive regulation of farmers and voluntary adoption of best practices has not solved the problem. However, municipal ordinances encouraging the sale of EEFs (Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers) could be a new approach to tackle nitrogen pollution. More than 11 million acres of corn farms, largely in just five states, apply fertilizer extremely inefficiently. These states could realize the most benefits from an EEF ordinance in the form of lowered costs for farmers, higher revenues for fertilizer companies, and fewer environmental and humanhealth problems caused by nitrogen. This Note describes the issue of nitrogen fertilizer pollution in the U.S., provides the reasoning for a municipal minimum sales share EEF ordinance, and proposes a sample ordinance that a municipality in Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan, Nebraska, or Ohio could adopt to manage the most serious effects of nitrogen pollution on public health and the environment. This Note then analyzes the history of ordinances that municipalities have passed in order to regulate certain products similar to nitrogen fertilizers. The litigation that ensued after these ordinances passed illuminates the likely legal hurdles that an EEF ordinance would face. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":246399,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Environmental Law","volume":"1698 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v47i1.9130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen pollution is one of the most pressing environmental problems in the U.S. today, with grave implications for human and environmental health. Agricultural activities release the most nitrogen pollution of any industry, but a combination of prescriptive regulation of farmers and voluntary adoption of best practices has not solved the problem. However, municipal ordinances encouraging the sale of EEFs (Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers) could be a new approach to tackle nitrogen pollution. More than 11 million acres of corn farms, largely in just five states, apply fertilizer extremely inefficiently. These states could realize the most benefits from an EEF ordinance in the form of lowered costs for farmers, higher revenues for fertilizer companies, and fewer environmental and humanhealth problems caused by nitrogen. This Note describes the issue of nitrogen fertilizer pollution in the U.S., provides the reasoning for a municipal minimum sales share EEF ordinance, and proposes a sample ordinance that a municipality in Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan, Nebraska, or Ohio could adopt to manage the most serious effects of nitrogen pollution on public health and the environment. This Note then analyzes the history of ordinances that municipalities have passed in order to regulate certain products similar to nitrogen fertilizers. The litigation that ensued after these ordinances passed illuminates the likely legal hurdles that an EEF ordinance would face.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球问题的局部解决方案
氮污染是当今美国最紧迫的环境问题之一,对人类和环境健康有着严重的影响。农业活动释放的氮污染是所有行业中最多的,但对农民的规定性监管和自愿采用最佳做法的结合并没有解决这个问题。然而,鼓励销售高效肥料(EEFs)的市政条例可能是解决氮污染的新方法。超过1100万英亩的玉米农场,主要分布在五个州,施肥效率极低。这些州可以从EEF条例中获得最大的好处,因为它可以降低农民的成本,提高肥料公司的收入,减少由氮引起的环境和人类健康问题。本文描述了美国的氮肥污染问题,提供了制定市政最低销售份额EEF条例的理由,并提出了一个样本条例,供伊利诺斯州、明尼苏达州、密歇根州、内布拉斯加州或俄亥俄州的市政当局采用,以管理氮污染对公众健康和环境的最严重影响。然后,本说明分析了市政当局为管理某些类似氮肥的产品而通过的法令的历史。这些条例通过后随之而来的诉讼,说明了EEF条例可能面临的法律障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ecoworship and Federal Environmental Law Green Funds in a Gray Area Wood Pellet Production in the U.S. South and Exportation for ‘Renewable’ Energy in Europe Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring Rotting Under the Bridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1