One vs. One Offline Signature Verification: A Forensic Handwriting Examiners Perspective

Moisés Díaz, J. B. Alonso, M. A. Ferrer-Ballester, Cristina Carmona
{"title":"One vs. One Offline Signature Verification: A Forensic Handwriting Examiners Perspective","authors":"Moisés Díaz, J. B. Alonso, M. A. Ferrer-Ballester, Cristina Carmona","doi":"10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verifying the authorship of a questioned signature is a common task for forensic handwriting examiners. While the automatic systems are typically orientated to improve performance, their practical utility for forensics is not always guaranteed. In this paper, we propose an offline automatic signature verifier oriented to forensic handwriting examiners. Our design is based on likelihood ratios which translate the signature verification results into objective and understandable evidence for a jury in a courtroom. The likelihood ratios depend on a universal background model build with signatures from other users and distance measures between signature handcrafted features. These features can be more interpretable for forensics, even though others can be included in our verifier, like deep learning ones. In our experiments, a single signature was used as reference. Two universal background models have been developed - the first is based on the GPDS database, and the second on synthetic signatures. The scheme is tried and tested with signatures from MCYT75 and BiosecureID databases with promising results. The outcome of this work is an offline signature verifier for forensic handwriting examiner practice.","PeriodicalId":101539,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Verifying the authorship of a questioned signature is a common task for forensic handwriting examiners. While the automatic systems are typically orientated to improve performance, their practical utility for forensics is not always guaranteed. In this paper, we propose an offline automatic signature verifier oriented to forensic handwriting examiners. Our design is based on likelihood ratios which translate the signature verification results into objective and understandable evidence for a jury in a courtroom. The likelihood ratios depend on a universal background model build with signatures from other users and distance measures between signature handcrafted features. These features can be more interpretable for forensics, even though others can be included in our verifier, like deep learning ones. In our experiments, a single signature was used as reference. Two universal background models have been developed - the first is based on the GPDS database, and the second on synthetic signatures. The scheme is tried and tested with signatures from MCYT75 and BiosecureID databases with promising results. The outcome of this work is an offline signature verifier for forensic handwriting examiner practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一对一离线签名验证:法医笔迹鉴定人的视角
验证可疑签名的作者身份是法医笔迹审查员的一项常见任务。虽然自动系统通常以提高性能为导向,但它们在取证方面的实际效用并不总是得到保证。本文提出了一种面向法医笔迹鉴定者的离线自动签名验证器。我们的设计基于似然比,它将签名验证结果转化为法庭上陪审团的客观和可理解的证据。可能性比依赖于由其他用户签名和签名手工特征之间的距离度量构建的通用背景模型。这些特征对于取证来说更容易解释,尽管其他特征也可以包含在我们的验证器中,比如深度学习。在我们的实验中,我们使用单个签名作为参考。已经开发了两个通用背景模型——第一个基于GPDS数据库,第二个基于合成特征。该方案通过MCYT75和biosecurid数据库的签名进行了试验和测试,结果令人鼓舞。这项工作的结果是一个离线签名验证法医笔迹审查员的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emotional analysis of safeness and risk perception of London and Rome railway stations during the COVID-19 pandemic Assessment of Foreign Trailer Number Plates on UK Roads, Implications for ANPR Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Biometric Verification Models Based on Short Enrollment Time on Medical and Wearable Recorders Emotional reactions to risk perception in the Herculaneum Archaeological Park Face Masks Usage Monitoring for Public Health Security using Computer Vision on Hardware
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1