Safety and Short-term Efcacy of a Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Surgical Treatment of Right Hemicolon Cancer

Ting Li, Xianguo Meng, W. Chen
{"title":"Safety and Short-term Efcacy of a Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Surgical Treatment of Right Hemicolon Cancer","authors":"Ting Li, Xianguo Meng, W. Chen","doi":"10.31491/CSRC.2018.6.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the safety and short-term efficacy of a laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) in patients with right hemicolon cancer. Methods: A total of 88 patients with right hemicolon cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Forty patients underwent laparoscopic CMEs, and 48 patients underwent open CMEs. The clinical data were analyzed and the outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic CME group and open CME group with regard to the harvested lymph node number (16.60±3.20 vs. 15.33±3.10, respectively, P=0.060), hospital stay length (18.15±5.17 days vs. 17.21±4.47 days, respectively, P=0.360), and postoperative complications (10.0% vs. 10.4%, respectively, P=0.950). The operation time in the laparoscopic CME group (3.02±0.55 hours) was significantly longer than that in the open CME group (2.58±0.50 hours, P=0.004). The time to first flatus (3.28±0.75 days vs 3.92±0.71 days, respectively, P=0.001) and getting out of bed time (1.95±0.75 days vs 3.54±0.71 days, respectively, P=0.001) were both earlier in the laparoscopic CME group than in the open CME group. Conclusion: A laparoscopic CME is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of right hemicolon cancer.","PeriodicalId":158678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgery Research Communications","volume":"05 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgery Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31491/CSRC.2018.6.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the safety and short-term efficacy of a laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) in patients with right hemicolon cancer. Methods: A total of 88 patients with right hemicolon cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Forty patients underwent laparoscopic CMEs, and 48 patients underwent open CMEs. The clinical data were analyzed and the outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic CME group and open CME group with regard to the harvested lymph node number (16.60±3.20 vs. 15.33±3.10, respectively, P=0.060), hospital stay length (18.15±5.17 days vs. 17.21±4.47 days, respectively, P=0.360), and postoperative complications (10.0% vs. 10.4%, respectively, P=0.950). The operation time in the laparoscopic CME group (3.02±0.55 hours) was significantly longer than that in the open CME group (2.58±0.50 hours, P=0.004). The time to first flatus (3.28±0.75 days vs 3.92±0.71 days, respectively, P=0.001) and getting out of bed time (1.95±0.75 days vs 3.54±0.71 days, respectively, P=0.001) were both earlier in the laparoscopic CME group than in the open CME group. Conclusion: A laparoscopic CME is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of right hemicolon cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜下全肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的安全性和短期疗效
目的:本研究旨在评估腹腔镜下全肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗右半结肠癌患者的安全性和短期疗效。方法:对88例右半结肠癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。40例患者行腹腔镜cme, 48例行开放式cme。分析两组临床资料,比较两组疗效。结果:腹腔镜CME组与开放式CME组在淋巴结清扫数(分别为16.60±3.20 vs 15.33±3.10,P=0.060)、住院时间(分别为18.15±5.17 d vs 17.21±4.47 d, P=0.360)、术后并发症(分别为10.0% vs 10.4%, P=0.950)方面差异无统计学意义。腹腔镜CME组手术时间(3.02±0.55 h)明显长于开放CME组(2.58±0.50 h, P=0.004)。第一次排气时间(分别为3.28±0.75天vs 3.92±0.71天,P=0.001)和下床时间(分别为1.95±0.75天vs 3.54±0.71天,P=0.001)腹腔镜CME组均早于开放式CME组。结论:腹腔镜下腔动脉造影是一种安全有效的治疗右半结肠癌的微创手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Focused ultrasound surgery in gynaecology – a call to validate a new surgical approach Clear cell sarcoma: 20 years of experience at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN) The rare patient with infrainguinal stent restenosis a complication: Atherectomy device fracture En-bloc excision of Giant Cell Tumors of the distal radius and arthrodesis of the translocated ipsilateral ulna: A report of two cases Wandering spleen with torsion presenting as a rare case of acute abdomen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1