Liability for Violation of the Duty of Care and Upbringing in the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany

O. Zaytsev, K. Pavshuk
{"title":"Liability for Violation of the Duty of Care and Upbringing in the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany","authors":"O. Zaytsev, K. Pavshuk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.276942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the topic of research is determined by the fact that the problem of non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment by parents (persons who replace them) of childcare responsibilities exists in all countries, regardless of the form of government, state system and income level of the population. Ukraine is in the process of integration with the European Union, so it is useful to study the foreign legislative approach to regulating responsibility for the violation of these obligations. The aim of the article is to study the German experience of establishing criminal liability for non-fulfillment of childcare obligations. Dogmatic, systemic-structural, statistical, historical-legal, formal-legal research methods were used in the research. Attention is paid to German legislation, which provides for the right and duty of parents to care for and bring up children. The genesis of the criminal law regarding the liability for violation of these duties is given. Statistical data on the number of criminal proceedings and persons convicted of this criminal offense (2010–2021) are summarized. The peculiarities of the structure of the crime provided for in § 171 of the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany have been studied; objective and subjective characteristics. The analysis was carried out on the basis of the doctrine of German criminal law and the practice of courts of general jurisdiction, in particular the Federal Supreme Court of Germany. The practice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany was used. Based on the study, conclusions were formulated regarding the definition of: the legal interest that is protected; signs of \"gross\" violation of duties; criteria for establishing the consequence of the crime, which is provided as the tort of creating danger. The peculiarities of the qualification of the crime in case of its commission in a place where an armed conflict is taking place are noted. The allocation of an independent structural section (subsection) in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which includes criminal offenses against family, is supported. The discussion of the criminalization of harm caused by a crime provided by Art. 166 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, creating a real threat (danger) of causing harm to the victim is proposed.\n ","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.276942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the topic of research is determined by the fact that the problem of non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment by parents (persons who replace them) of childcare responsibilities exists in all countries, regardless of the form of government, state system and income level of the population. Ukraine is in the process of integration with the European Union, so it is useful to study the foreign legislative approach to regulating responsibility for the violation of these obligations. The aim of the article is to study the German experience of establishing criminal liability for non-fulfillment of childcare obligations. Dogmatic, systemic-structural, statistical, historical-legal, formal-legal research methods were used in the research. Attention is paid to German legislation, which provides for the right and duty of parents to care for and bring up children. The genesis of the criminal law regarding the liability for violation of these duties is given. Statistical data on the number of criminal proceedings and persons convicted of this criminal offense (2010–2021) are summarized. The peculiarities of the structure of the crime provided for in § 171 of the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany have been studied; objective and subjective characteristics. The analysis was carried out on the basis of the doctrine of German criminal law and the practice of courts of general jurisdiction, in particular the Federal Supreme Court of Germany. The practice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany was used. Based on the study, conclusions were formulated regarding the definition of: the legal interest that is protected; signs of "gross" violation of duties; criteria for establishing the consequence of the crime, which is provided as the tort of creating danger. The peculiarities of the qualification of the crime in case of its commission in a place where an armed conflict is taking place are noted. The allocation of an independent structural section (subsection) in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which includes criminal offenses against family, is supported. The discussion of the criminalization of harm caused by a crime provided by Art. 166 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, creating a real threat (danger) of causing harm to the victim is proposed.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《德意志联邦共和国刑法》中违反照顾和抚养义务的责任
研究课题的相关性取决于这样一个事实,即无论政府形式、国家制度和人口收入水平如何,所有国家都存在父母(替代他们的人)未履行或不当履行儿童保育责任的问题。乌克兰正处于与欧洲联盟一体化的进程中,因此,研究外国立法方法来规范违反这些义务的责任是有益的。本文的目的是研究德国设立不履行托儿义务刑事责任的经验。研究中采用了教条式、系统结构式、统计式、历史法学、形式法学等研究方法。我们注意到德国的立法,其中规定父母有照顾和抚养儿童的权利和义务。对违反这些义务的责任的刑法渊源进行了分析。总结了2010-2021年关于刑事诉讼数量和被判犯有这种刑事罪行的人数的统计数据。对《德意志联邦共和国刑法》第171条规定的犯罪结构的特点进行了研究;客观和主观的特点。这项分析是根据德国刑法的理论和具有一般管辖权的法院,特别是德国联邦最高法院的实践进行的。采用了德国联邦宪法法院的做法。在研究的基础上,得出以下结论:受保护的法律利益的定义;“严重”违反职责的迹象;确立犯罪后果的标准,规定为构成危险的侵权行为。委员会注意到在发生武装冲突的地方实施的罪行所具有的特殊资格。委员会支持在《乌克兰刑法》中分配一个独立的结构节(分节),其中包括危害家庭的刑事罪行。建议讨论对乌克兰《刑法》第166条所规定的对受害人造成伤害的真正威胁(危险)的罪行所造成的伤害进行刑事定罪的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of legal regulation of exemptions in the payment and calculation of land fees in the conditions of martial law on the basis of judicial practice Ways to Protect Infringed Rights in the Creation and Distribution of Deepfakes Creation and Legal Status of a Specially Authorized Body of Non-Banking Financial Services Implementation of the Ecosystem Services Concept in the Environmental Legislation of Ukraine: Current State and Prospects Modern Challenges of Adjusting the Effectiveness of the Application of Laws (on the Example of Tax and Legal Regulation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1