Value at risk estimation of the SET50 index: Comparison between stock exchange of Thailand and Thailand futures exchange

W. Jongadsayakul
{"title":"Value at risk estimation of the SET50 index: Comparison between stock exchange of Thailand and Thailand futures exchange","authors":"W. Jongadsayakul","doi":"10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Value at Risk (VaR) is the most widely used measure of risk. This study uses SET50 daily returns from the period from July 3, 2015 to December 27, 2019 to estimate VaR for the assessment of risk exposure at the Stock Exchange of Thailand and Thailand Futures Exchange using the three following methods: non-parametric method with the historical simulation approach, parametric method with GARCH family models, and semi-parametric method with volatility-weight historical simulation of the GARCH family models. Accuracy of the estimated models is also assessed by performing the VaR backtests of unconditional coverage, independence, and conditional coverage. In forecasting VaR with the confidence level of 95%, historical simulation and asymmetric GARCH models (TARCH and EGARCH models) give solid results and outrank volatility weight historical simulation. Moreover, a comparison of stock investments with a correlation to the performance of SET50 Index and SET50 Index Futures investment indicates that SET50 Index Futures investment carries higher risk. Therefore, investment decisions on SET50 Index Futures should be taken more carefully since this market is more volatile than the underlying spot market.","PeriodicalId":330787,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of international studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of international studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Value at Risk (VaR) is the most widely used measure of risk. This study uses SET50 daily returns from the period from July 3, 2015 to December 27, 2019 to estimate VaR for the assessment of risk exposure at the Stock Exchange of Thailand and Thailand Futures Exchange using the three following methods: non-parametric method with the historical simulation approach, parametric method with GARCH family models, and semi-parametric method with volatility-weight historical simulation of the GARCH family models. Accuracy of the estimated models is also assessed by performing the VaR backtests of unconditional coverage, independence, and conditional coverage. In forecasting VaR with the confidence level of 95%, historical simulation and asymmetric GARCH models (TARCH and EGARCH models) give solid results and outrank volatility weight historical simulation. Moreover, a comparison of stock investments with a correlation to the performance of SET50 Index and SET50 Index Futures investment indicates that SET50 Index Futures investment carries higher risk. Therefore, investment decisions on SET50 Index Futures should be taken more carefully since this market is more volatile than the underlying spot market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SET50指数的风险价值估计:泰国证券交易所与泰国期货交易所的比较
风险价值(VaR)是最广泛使用的风险度量。本研究以2015年7月3日至2019年12月27日的SET50日收益为样本,采用历史模拟法的非参数法、GARCH家族模型的参数法和GARCH家族模型波动率-权重历史模拟的半参数法估计泰国证券交易所和泰国期货交易所风险敞口的VaR。通过执行无条件覆盖率、独立性和条件覆盖率的VaR回测,还评估了估计模型的准确性。在预测置信水平为95%的VaR时,历史模拟和非对称GARCH模型(TARCH和EGARCH模型)给出了可靠的结果,并且优于波动率权重历史模拟。此外,将与SET50指数表现相关的股票投资与SET50指数期货投资进行比较,可以发现SET50指数期货投资风险更高。因此,SET50指数期货的投资决策应该更加谨慎,因为这个市场比基础现货市场更不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Conflict-related Sexual Violence on Kinship Networks: Case of Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh Covid-19 dan Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Sebagai Pandemi Bayangan (The Shadow Pandemic) Evaluating Indonesia's Disaster Diplomacy Practices Under The Jokowi Administration In 2018 Merauke “Food Estate”: Alternatif Penanganan Konflik Di Papua Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi-Sosial Dan Budaya Whose Governance, Which Legitimacy? Myanmar’s Collective Agency In A Domineering Framework On The Rohingya Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1