Changes in mode of control and self-control for post myocardial infarction patients evidencing Type A behavior: the effects of a cognitive/behavioral intervention and/or cardiac counseling.

D H Shapiro, M Friedman, G Piaget
{"title":"Changes in mode of control and self-control for post myocardial infarction patients evidencing Type A behavior: the effects of a cognitive/behavioral intervention and/or cardiac counseling.","authors":"D H Shapiro,&nbsp;M Friedman,&nbsp;G Piaget","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A control model of psychological health was utilized to assess the effects of a cognitive/behavioral intervention and/or cardiac counseling with post myocardial infarction patients evidencing Type A behavior. A previously developed four quadrant control inventory measuring perceived mode of control and perceived self-control was given to groups in two sections of the Recurrent Coronary Prevention Project. The experimental group (coronary counseling plus cognitive/behavioral intervention) was tested after one year (E1) and two years (E2) of treatment. The cardiac counseling group was assessed only after two years (C2). As hypothesized, the cognitive/behavioral treatment section at E2 had a significantly higher overall satisfaction level and congruence between real and ideal self on each of the four quadrants than at E1, and than the cardiac counseling only (C2). Further, on each of the four quadrants, E2 had a psychologically healthier mode of control profile than the cardiac counseling only (C2); and a healthier profile on both the positive assertive and positive yielding mode of control than at E1. Finally, E2's self-control score was significantly higher than C2's. Comments on future directions in measuring perceived control, and on the relationship of control and Type A behavior are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":77182,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychosomatics : official publication of the International Psychosomatics Institute","volume":"38 1-4","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychosomatics : official publication of the International Psychosomatics Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A control model of psychological health was utilized to assess the effects of a cognitive/behavioral intervention and/or cardiac counseling with post myocardial infarction patients evidencing Type A behavior. A previously developed four quadrant control inventory measuring perceived mode of control and perceived self-control was given to groups in two sections of the Recurrent Coronary Prevention Project. The experimental group (coronary counseling plus cognitive/behavioral intervention) was tested after one year (E1) and two years (E2) of treatment. The cardiac counseling group was assessed only after two years (C2). As hypothesized, the cognitive/behavioral treatment section at E2 had a significantly higher overall satisfaction level and congruence between real and ideal self on each of the four quadrants than at E1, and than the cardiac counseling only (C2). Further, on each of the four quadrants, E2 had a psychologically healthier mode of control profile than the cardiac counseling only (C2); and a healthier profile on both the positive assertive and positive yielding mode of control than at E1. Finally, E2's self-control score was significantly higher than C2's. Comments on future directions in measuring perceived control, and on the relationship of control and Type A behavior are offered.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌梗死后患者控制和自我控制模式的改变:认知/行为干预和/或心脏咨询的影响
采用心理健康控制模型评估认知/行为干预和/或心脏咨询对有A型行为的心肌梗死后患者的影响。先前开发的四象限控制量表测量感知控制模式和感知自我控制,给予两个部分的组复发性冠状动脉预防项目。实验组(冠状动脉咨询加认知/行为干预)在治疗1年(E1)和2年(E2)后进行测试。心脏咨询组仅在两年后进行评估(C2)。正如假设的那样,E2的认知/行为治疗部分在四个象限上的总体满意度和真实自我与理想自我之间的一致性显著高于E1和仅心脏咨询(C2)。此外,在四个象限中的每一个象限中,E2的心理控制模式比仅进行心脏咨询的人更健康(C2);在积极自信和积极屈服的控制模式上都比E1组更健康。最后,E2的自我控制得分显著高于C2。对未来测量感知控制的方向以及控制与A型行为的关系提出了意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effects of electrode placement upon EEG biofeedback training: the monopolar-bipolar controversy. Anxiety and its control. Implanted transmitter in maxilla: real or imaginary? Psychotherapeutic implications of self-discoveries made in exploring psychologically-caused physical symptoms. Psychological factors in psychosomatic diseases: an outline of research results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1