Classification Algorithms for Software Defect Prediction: A Systematic Literature Review

Ma. José Hemández-Molinos, Á. Sánchez-García, R. Barrientos-Martínez
{"title":"Classification Algorithms for Software Defect Prediction: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Ma. José Hemández-Molinos, Á. Sánchez-García, R. Barrientos-Martínez","doi":"10.1109/CONISOFT52520.2021.00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within Software Engineering, it is essential to build quality software. An obstacle to the after mentioned are the defects that can be found in any phase of software development. That is why the area of software defect prediction emerged, in which different algorithms have already been evaluated, studied, and proposed. The objective of this paper is to carry out a Systematic Literature Review, to know which are the classification algorithms that help to predict software defects. In the same way, it is intended to know the features, metrics and what has been the precision of the classification algorithms for software defect prediction. This paper shows that the most widely used classifiers to predict defects are Naive Bayes and Random Forest, while those that show the best results are Naive Bayes and Boosting. Finally, it is highlighted that Precision and Recall are the most used metrics for model validation.","PeriodicalId":380632,"journal":{"name":"2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT52520.2021.00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Within Software Engineering, it is essential to build quality software. An obstacle to the after mentioned are the defects that can be found in any phase of software development. That is why the area of software defect prediction emerged, in which different algorithms have already been evaluated, studied, and proposed. The objective of this paper is to carry out a Systematic Literature Review, to know which are the classification algorithms that help to predict software defects. In the same way, it is intended to know the features, metrics and what has been the precision of the classification algorithms for software defect prediction. This paper shows that the most widely used classifiers to predict defects are Naive Bayes and Random Forest, while those that show the best results are Naive Bayes and Boosting. Finally, it is highlighted that Precision and Recall are the most used metrics for model validation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件缺陷预测的分类算法:系统的文献综述
在软件工程中,构建高质量的软件是必不可少的。后面提到的障碍是在软件开发的任何阶段都可以发现的缺陷。这就是为什么软件缺陷预测领域出现的原因,在这个领域中,不同的算法已经被评估、研究和提出。本文的目的是进行系统的文献综述,以了解哪些分类算法有助于预测软件缺陷。以同样的方式,它旨在了解用于软件缺陷预测的分类算法的特征、度量和精度。本文表明,在缺陷预测中应用最广泛的分类器是朴素贝叶斯和随机森林,而效果最好的分类器是朴素贝叶斯和Boosting。最后,强调了Precision和Recall是模型验证最常用的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scrumlity: An Agile Framework Based on Quality Assurance Information Visualization In Adaptable Dashboards For Smart Cities: A Systematic Review Microservices Deployment: A Systematic Mapping Study Automatic Grading of Programming Assignments in Moodle Software Design and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Mapping Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1