Attributions about the causes and consequences of cataclysmic events

S. Yates
{"title":"Attributions about the causes and consequences of cataclysmic events","authors":"S. Yates","doi":"10.1080/10811449808414428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Basic to the study of disasters and other life crises are questions about how victims and observers make sense of the event. Attribution theory, which describes how and why people ascribe causes to events and behaviors, can provide a useful framework for helping researchers in their quest to understand how and why victims and observers respond as they do to cataclysmic events. In spite of its clear potential for guiding research, surprisingly few studies looking at disaster and nearly no studies of terrorism have used an attributional perspective. While other negative life crises have been studied, cataclysmic events such as disasters and terrorist attacks possess distinctive features that set them apart from other types of trauma. Because of differences in degree of consensus, perceived control, and intentionality, cataclysmic events offer attribution researchers a unique arena in which to test and clarify basic assumptions. This article reveiws the work done in the field and outlines areas of c...","PeriodicalId":343335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811449808414428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Basic to the study of disasters and other life crises are questions about how victims and observers make sense of the event. Attribution theory, which describes how and why people ascribe causes to events and behaviors, can provide a useful framework for helping researchers in their quest to understand how and why victims and observers respond as they do to cataclysmic events. In spite of its clear potential for guiding research, surprisingly few studies looking at disaster and nearly no studies of terrorism have used an attributional perspective. While other negative life crises have been studied, cataclysmic events such as disasters and terrorist attacks possess distinctive features that set them apart from other types of trauma. Because of differences in degree of consensus, perceived control, and intentionality, cataclysmic events offer attribution researchers a unique arena in which to test and clarify basic assumptions. This article reveiws the work done in the field and outlines areas of c...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于灾难性事件的原因和后果的归因
灾难和其他生活危机研究的基本问题是受害者和观察者如何理解事件。归因理论描述了人们如何以及为什么将原因归因于事件和行为,它可以为研究人员提供一个有用的框架,帮助他们理解受害者和观察者如何以及为什么对灾难性事件做出反应。尽管它在指导研究方面具有明显的潜力,但令人惊讶的是,很少有关于灾难的研究和几乎没有关于恐怖主义的研究使用归因视角。虽然研究了其他负面的生活危机,但灾难和恐怖袭击等灾难性事件具有与其他类型的创伤不同的独特特征。由于共识程度、感知控制和意向性的差异,灾难性事件为归因研究人员提供了一个独特的领域来测试和澄清基本假设。本文回顾了在该领域所做的工作,并概述了c…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living With The Facts, Negotiating The Terms: Unrealistic Beliefs, Denial, and Adjustment In The First Year Of Acquired Physical Disability The Relationships among Differing Loss Experiences, Adjustment, Beliefs, and Coping. Attitudes Toward Euthanasia and Justifying Reasons Of Elderly Israelis and Their Family Members Motherloss: An Adult Daughter's Depth Perspective Sawdust for Brains: Definition and Disconfirmation after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1