Diagnostic Performance of Mean Platelet Volume in the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

Kathrina Acapulco, Shayne Julieane L. Morales, Tzar Francis Verame
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Mean Platelet Volume in the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Kathrina Acapulco, Shayne Julieane L. Morales, Tzar Francis Verame","doi":"10.21141/pjp.2020.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction among adult patients with angina and/or its equivalents in terms of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and likelihood ratios. Methodology. The primary search was done through search in electronic databases. Cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control articles studying the diagnostic performance of mean platelet volume in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in adult patients were included in the study. Eligible studies were appraised using well-defined criteria. Results. The overall mean MPV value of those with MI (9.702 fl; 95% CI 9.07 – 10.33) was higher than in those of the non-MI control group (8.85 fl; 95% CI 8.23 – 9.46). Interpretation of the calculated t-value of 2.0827 showed that there was a significant difference in the mean MPV values of those with MI and those of the non-MI controls. The summary sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for MPV were 0.66 (95% CI; 0.59 - 0.73) and 0.60 (95% CI; 0.43 – 0.75), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 2.92 (95% CI; 1.90 – 4.50). The positive likelihood ratio of MPV in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction was 1.65 (95% CI; 1.20 – 22.27), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.56 (95% CI; 0.50 – 0.64). Conclusion. The intended role for MPV in the diagnostic pathway of myocardial infarction would perhaps be best as a triage tool. MPV values can discriminate between those who have MI and those without. For a patient with angina presenting with elevated MPV values, it is 1.65 times more likely that he has MI. It is implied that the decision to treat a patient with angina or its equivalents as a case of MI could be supported by an elevated MPV value.","PeriodicalId":166708,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Pathology","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21141/pjp.2020.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction among adult patients with angina and/or its equivalents in terms of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and likelihood ratios. Methodology. The primary search was done through search in electronic databases. Cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control articles studying the diagnostic performance of mean platelet volume in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in adult patients were included in the study. Eligible studies were appraised using well-defined criteria. Results. The overall mean MPV value of those with MI (9.702 fl; 95% CI 9.07 – 10.33) was higher than in those of the non-MI control group (8.85 fl; 95% CI 8.23 – 9.46). Interpretation of the calculated t-value of 2.0827 showed that there was a significant difference in the mean MPV values of those with MI and those of the non-MI controls. The summary sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for MPV were 0.66 (95% CI; 0.59 - 0.73) and 0.60 (95% CI; 0.43 – 0.75), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 2.92 (95% CI; 1.90 – 4.50). The positive likelihood ratio of MPV in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction was 1.65 (95% CI; 1.20 – 22.27), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.56 (95% CI; 0.50 – 0.64). Conclusion. The intended role for MPV in the diagnostic pathway of myocardial infarction would perhaps be best as a triage tool. MPV values can discriminate between those who have MI and those without. For a patient with angina presenting with elevated MPV values, it is 1.65 times more likely that he has MI. It is implied that the decision to treat a patient with angina or its equivalents as a case of MI could be supported by an elevated MPV value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平均血小板体积在诊断急性心肌梗死中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析
目标。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是根据敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比和似然比,确定平均血小板体积在成年心绞痛患者和/或同等疾病中诊断心肌梗死的诊断准确性的汇总估计。方法。初步检索是通过电子数据库检索完成的。研究平均血小板体积在成人急性心肌梗死诊断中的诊断作用的横断面、队列和病例对照文章被纳入研究。使用定义明确的标准对符合条件的研究进行评价。结果。心肌梗死患者总体平均MPV值(9.702 fl;95% CI 9.07 ~ 10.33)高于非心肌梗死对照组(8.85 fl;95% ci 8.23 - 9.46)。对计算的t值2.0827的解释表明,心肌梗死患者的平均MPV值与非心肌梗死对照组的平均MPV值有显著差异。MPV的总敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)为0.66 (95% CI;0.59 - 0.73)和0.60 (95% CI;0.43 - 0.75)。合并诊断优势比(DOR)为2.92 (95% CI;1.90 - 4.50)。MPV诊断心肌梗死的阳性似然比为1.65 (95% CI;1.20 ~ 22.27),负似然比为0.56 (95% CI;0.50 - 0.64)。结论。MPV在心肌梗死诊断途径中的预期作用可能是最好的分诊工具。MPV值可以区分心肌梗死患者和非心肌梗死患者。对于MPV值升高的心绞痛患者,其心肌梗死的可能性是心肌梗死的1.65倍。这意味着MPV值升高可以支持将心绞痛患者或类似症状患者作为心肌梗死进行治疗的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defining the Terms of Reference of the PSP’s Committee on Academic and Research Pathology Mucosal Melanoma of the Male Urethra: A Case Report Correlation of Clinicopathologic Features of Filipino Primary Breast Cancer Patients with HER2 Subgroups Classified according to the ASCO/CAP 2018 Breast Cancer HER2 Testing Guidelines Needs Assessment for Establishment of Telepathology in the Philippines Ethical Concerns and Recommendations for Sharing Anatomic Pathology Images on Online Social Media Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1