Knowledge and Risk Perception of COVID-19 and the Willingness to Take COVID-19 Vaccine among Tertiary Institution Students in Jos, Plateau State: a Comparative Assessment of Medical and Nursing Students

H. Agbo, NB Noel, C. Nkala, J. Mamza, R. Balogun
{"title":"Knowledge and Risk Perception of COVID-19 and the Willingness to Take COVID-19 Vaccine among Tertiary Institution Students in Jos, Plateau State: a Comparative Assessment of Medical and Nursing Students","authors":"H. Agbo, NB Noel, C. Nkala, J. Mamza, R. Balogun","doi":"10.46912/jeson.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronavirus disease has assumed increasing public health importance globally, especially in terms of its impact on the health systems and economies. Despite the abundance of information on COVID-19 in the public domain, misinformation is rife and the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine is tainted by controversies and cynicisms. This study compared the knowledge and risk perception of COVID-19 between medical and nursing students in Jos and their willingness to take the vaccine. \nMethods: This was a comparative cross-sectional study among 186 medical and 129 nursing students in Jos selected through a stratified sampling technique. Data was collected through a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. \nResults: Medical students had significantly better knowledge (55.4% vs 5.4%) and risk perception (93.5% vs 47.3%) of COVID-19 compared to the nursing students (˂0.0001). One hundred and fifty seven respondents (71.1%) were vaccine-hesitant and this was worse in the nursing students (82.9%) than in the medical students (62.9%). Lack of trust for a COVID-19 vaccine bothering on its efficacy, safety profile, adverse effects, and rapidity of development and testing were the leading reasons for vaccine hesitancy. \nConclusion: Medical students had better knowledge and perception of COVID-19 risk than their nursing counterparts. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is high among medical and nursing students. Therefore, further education by school authorities on COVID-19 and the role of vaccines in its control is necessary","PeriodicalId":302969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiological Society of Nigeria","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiological Society of Nigeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46912/jeson.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease has assumed increasing public health importance globally, especially in terms of its impact on the health systems and economies. Despite the abundance of information on COVID-19 in the public domain, misinformation is rife and the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine is tainted by controversies and cynicisms. This study compared the knowledge and risk perception of COVID-19 between medical and nursing students in Jos and their willingness to take the vaccine. Methods: This was a comparative cross-sectional study among 186 medical and 129 nursing students in Jos selected through a stratified sampling technique. Data was collected through a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Medical students had significantly better knowledge (55.4% vs 5.4%) and risk perception (93.5% vs 47.3%) of COVID-19 compared to the nursing students (˂0.0001). One hundred and fifty seven respondents (71.1%) were vaccine-hesitant and this was worse in the nursing students (82.9%) than in the medical students (62.9%). Lack of trust for a COVID-19 vaccine bothering on its efficacy, safety profile, adverse effects, and rapidity of development and testing were the leading reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Conclusion: Medical students had better knowledge and perception of COVID-19 risk than their nursing counterparts. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is high among medical and nursing students. Therefore, further education by school authorities on COVID-19 and the role of vaccines in its control is necessary
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高原州乔斯市高等院校医、护生对新冠肺炎知识、风险认知及疫苗接种意愿的比较评估
背景:冠状病毒病在全球公共卫生领域的重要性日益增加,特别是在其对卫生系统和经济的影响方面。尽管公共领域有大量关于COVID-19的信息,但错误信息普遍存在,COVID-19疫苗的使用受到争议和愤世嫉俗的影响。本研究比较了乔斯市医、护生对COVID-19的知识和风险认知以及接种疫苗的意愿。方法:采用分层抽样方法,对乔斯市186名医学生和129名护学生进行横断面比较研究。数据通过半结构化的自我管理问卷收集,并使用社会科学统计软件包第23版进行分析。p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:医学生对COVID-19的知识(55.4% vs 5.4%)和风险认知(93.5% vs 47.3%)明显优于护生(依据依据的依据,依据依据的依据)。157名应答者(71.1%)存在疫苗犹豫,其中护生(82.9%)高于医学生(62.9%)。对COVID-19疫苗缺乏信任,对其有效性、安全性、不良反应以及开发和测试的速度感到困扰,是疫苗犹豫的主要原因。结论:医学生对COVID-19风险的认知和感知强于护理同行。医学和护理专业学生对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫率很高。因此,学校当局有必要就COVID-19和疫苗在控制中的作用进行进一步教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk Perception and Uptake of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine among University Students in Jos, Plateau State Assessment of Availability of Human Resource and Services for Newborn Care in Primary Health Care Facilities in Jos North Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria A Review of Blood and Blood Products Requisition and Utilization in Post-neonatal Ward of a Tertiary Hospital in South Western Nigeria Perception of Risk for Lassa Fever among Residents of a Rural Community in Edo State, Nigeria Effect of Socio-demographic Status, Knowledge, and Attitude on Utilisation of Safe Delivery Practices among Mothers of Children attending Child Welfare Clinics in Osogbo, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1